Worst regimes of the 20th century, In Association with African Safari Choice

In Association with African Safari Choice

Featured Product

My list of the TOP 10 most evil regimes of the 20th Century in terms of deaths, facts collected from a severe research of the books, and facts.

1. Nazi Germany 38 million deaths,
in World War Two, and the Holocaust,
2. Imperial Germany 34 million deaths,
by being the specific major cause of WW1, and the 1918 Flu, and the colonial depradations, in Africa.
3. Imperial China 28 million deaths
by the 1900s famines, and slavery,
4. Imperial Japan 27 million deaths,
by WW2, and the colonial oppressions
5. Imperial Russia 24 million deaths,
by helping cause WW1, and numerous famines, and the Iranian famine of 1917
6. Communist China 22 Million deaths
By famines, and democides
7. Communist USSR 21 million deaths,
By famines, and oppressions
8. Imperial Austria 17.5 million deaths,
by helping cause WW1, and committing some massacres during it,
9. The demon Belgian king 15 million deaths, Look at http ://www.lonympics.co.uk/
By inflicting the Congo empire democides,
10. British Empire 12 million deaths
By numerous famines, and wars in the early 20thC
10 KMT Nationalists China, 12 million deaths in World War 2, actions in the civil war, and also other oppressions Look at

The statistics here are steel tight, and the best measure, of who wreaked most havoc across the planet. Among the most important and useful subjects there is, for everybody. In terms of death the most murderous regimes are fascist and monarchial. As you would expect seeing that the crime of Communism, was that they were dictatorships, but the crime of monarchy as that they innately can not treat all people as equals, unless they are not really monarchies like Britain, and just have a monarch as head of state, like a pointless totem, who wastes money,

So there you have it all monarchy is a sin, and a murderous ideal, that cares about a millionaire hurting it's toe, but not entire towns and villages. It kills, it causes calamities, across world history. American history, and European history, and 3rd world history, From it's luxury too cheap poverty.

We should have republics, not putting the lowest price on humanity, but the best value.

The top 2 of this list both supported the German monarchy and cried when it quit in 1918, when ousted by a socialist revolution. This along with the 1917 Russian Revolution ended World War one.

In terms of deaths of course no regime, matches the Nazi regime. In terms of what I like to call Nazi, which is any racist far right regime, on this list alone would be all but the Communist deaths, and some British Empire deaths. So the Nazis, or fascists, Nazis, colonialists and monarchists, have killed many times what Communism killed.

Some may say I should not include World war Two, or World War one, or the Flu, or famines. I think this is mad, surely all deaths from World War One, and the Flu, of 1918, were caused by the Kaiser's desire to reduce the world to a German colony by war. Some lists like this claim we should not include World War two, battle and famine deaths. Such as the famous inaccuracy". Stalin killed more than Hitler", a statement veiled out normally by right wingers, trying to defend racism, or pretend the NHS is as evil a concept as racism, as of it being state ran. That may be only the most dumb element of right wingers, but they do have allot of influence over their followers, and so people believe misleading pro inequality anti real freedom anti utopia beliefs. In actual fact the claim about Stalin is a lie, yes he killed many, but actually there are many stats which include lower birth rates in Ukraine as deaths, and claim more people died in the Gulags, than the amount of people other just as right wing people, claim were in them in total. There are also claims which really were just to help the 1980s fight versus communism, which are actually inaccurate, useful, but wrong. The same people who claim there is nothing wrong with monarchy, the type who say "it does not matter if we have the same constitutional system as monarchy, as in the end of lord of the flies is ruling us, or some elected leader", are the same people, who then exaggerate the stats for Communism, willfully so they can claim any state tax, or welfare is wrong. There are some people, who claim that individual Communist regimes killed more than the Nazs, by only including the Holocaust deaths by the Nazis, (12million). They then include all the deaths as of Communism from the famine, to Gulags, to anything. This is insane, thats like saying Margaret Thatcher killed more people than Hitler, you know just minus out the Holocaust (as well as world war two), and she killed more via the Falklands war. Surely if you include the famine in Ukraine, and Gulags, then you should include the World War two famines, caused by the invasions of the USSR. And surely the intent to kill in the Stalin's famines was not always there, as can be shown by how the population of Ukraine increased most years of peace, before and after the famine in the Soviet era. Surely the policy of the Nazis, in their European famines during World War Two, was partly to kill races they felt were inferior, and partly as they did not care, infact if we exclude any famine deaths it should be the Stalin era deaths as they were far more as of ignorance, and incompetence, than as of genocidal intent. There is no doubt the USSR had on some occasions intentions to wipe out Ukrainian populations, but these people were often sent to Gulags, and that was evil. But the fact is most Ukrainian famine deaths were as of incompetence. The fact also is that most European famine deaths in World War Two were as of a evil intention, that if it had succeeded in it's conquest would probably have killed at least a few times as many people as who died in World war two. So as I say, my gripe is this, if we include the Ukrainian famine as a stat to include, we should also include the European famines under the Nazis. In this case you get something like 12-20million people. Then I feel also the war stats should be blamed on the Nazis, as without them the war would not have occurred, indeed the party was constantly saying in the 1930s it wanted war, it felt war was natural as everybody else even most monarchial, and all the Communist dictatorships, were puzzling why anybody would want war. Surely the fact is the Nazis knew what war would bring and planned more deaths than actually occurred, so they can be blamed for all the deaths in World War Two, So from this my stat is there, and we know what is what, people who say "Stalin killed more than Hitler" are relying on stats that are lies. If you include lowered birth rates as a death, then World War Two, killed somewhere approaching 50-80million people, but a lower birth rate is not a death, it is certainly not an abortion or a death, as the births were not happening. If it is, then all the above stats go up again, and some overtake the Communist regimes. If you include lower birth rates as deaths, then monks are committing genocide, as are everybody who is not reproducing triplets every 9 months. Yes I respect the Rummel, style calculations, but they are maybe a bit biased to the right, but even then they do accept right left and centre all did bad stuff. Added to this they are very much in favour of democracy, so they must be respected as very useful sources. The worst are lunatic right winger who solely claim lefties did, and insanely never admit that monarchies were just a bit better than Nazis, and miles worse than the Communists.

And in the same way, you can blame Germany, then Russia, and Austria-Hungary for World War One, as they made the actions that caused it. And were extremely uncompromising in their attitude, unlike France, Britain, the USA, and the Ottomans, the other major involved states who were very much prepared for peace, and wanting peace.

Lots of Nazis moan about the "Holocaust industry" whenever a history book or movie is about that subject. They never call it the "Gulag industry" when a book is about communism, or the guillotine industry when it is about some of their royal evil kings being executed.

So there is no doubt what so ever, that monarchy is a killer, and that corrupt lunatics will ally to it, and not care about creating more terrorists (like in todays most powerful real monarchy in Arabia, where the world's biggest terrorism is from), and world war one, and also world war two.

Also here is my other statement which shows that the 1930s Soviet leader was better than the 1930s German ruler. The biggest fact of the lot is that they had different intentions. The Soviet Communists intentions were good, they wanted a better society. There is no doubt what so ever, that no matter how bad Communism, was and corrupt it was always, and brutal, the aim was a better society for all. The far right intentions were evil, they made no bones in claiming"war is natural;" that the weak and vulnerable and weaker deserved to be wiped out. There is no doubt what so ever that one of those aims is evil and the other is not. There is no doubt some will claim the Nazis had good aims, that they were not just about what I stated, but there is no doubt what so ever, that that was a main belief a main means and a main ends, that they WANTED unfairness, that they WANTED unhappiness, there is no doubt the Communists aim was NOT unhappiness, for millions. That is why the end product was the Nazis killing more, and why we should see them as innately the most evil regime of the century, and fear people who want us to believe that Communists were more evil than Nazis. They have a scary bully and torture loving belief. The NAZIS are the anti-Bible, the story of what your kids should not believe. The Communists were a regimes that successfully under Lenin, ousted a more murderous Tsarist regime, and were then followed by a brutal regime, that defeated a invasion that wanted to reduce the Russian and other Soviet people's to being slaves that apparently would be so much slaves, that they according to the Nazi leader should be afraid to talk to even the weakest German, for fear of reprisals. And who according to maps, wanted to kill most of the Soviet population long term, and push the rest East of the Urals. There is NO DOUBT in the real world whose intentions were more evil. And there is no doubt which regime killed most, and in a far shorter era.

Also we can say we can thank the Communist regime of the 1920s for ousting a Tsar that caused millions of deaths, and thank the 1940s Soviet regime, for defeating a regime that wanted to destroy the world for millions of people, as it was just evil. So in effect the net effect of the Communists for the USSR was good. Long term it will be good they were ousted, as they opposed freedom, and so equality, but that will take time.

And right wingers always talk about "the Ukrainian famine" but they only do so that we do not care about the victims of the Holocaust. Programmes about the Holocaust always show empathy with the sufferers, yes they rightly show some bits which make viewers want the Nazis dead. But programmes about Gulags, are normally by left wingers trying to tell other left wingers not to become Communists, or are right wingers, saying "see the nazis were not that special, lots of people killed people", most right wing critics of Communism, focus on poor old king stupid face being deposed from being waited on hand and foot, and having to move house, they never show empathy, or if they do there is something fake about it, like White farmers in Zimbabwe, pretending it's the black farmers, who under them lived in huts, they care for in Zimbabwe, not the fact they have lost huge mansions. I may be being a bit unfair there, but loads of journalists have recently been writing books, and putting in articles statements which can be coded as being just "Stalin was worse than Hitler", something that is not true. You may say people have a right to say this, but loads of times they say this just as the Nazis are being critisised,

They, the right wing never did anything for the victims of the Ukrainian famine in the 1930s, indeed in the US the Republican party campaigned against immigration of Eastern Europeans in the 1920s, as part of their election campaign. They cared when monarchs were executed, or when right wing regimes, and capitalism, was replaced, but did not when Ukrainians died of famine. Anyhow more importantly more Ukrainians died under the Nazi invasion than in the Ukrainian famine, so they can talk all they like about Ukrainians in ways that are really just to stop us caring about the Holocaust, but they killed more than the left did. That is why when Ukrainians are asked which was better the Nazis, or Communists, most say Communism, but are happy the Communists were ousted.

Yes so thats it, and what is greatest of all, no democracies appear on the list. All the above lists opposed democratic liberal society. So that is that democracy and freedom are best with socialism.

I know it may seem pointless to defend Communism, against Nazi-ism, and then to say it killed millions of people, so disproving the idea that the regimes were good. But I am not trying to support Communist dictatorships, all I am saying is the fact that they were better than the Nazis, and the Monarchists. This matters, as if people do not realise that, then right wingers will claim otherwise and will make it seem the Communists were not worse than Clive of India, or the King who supported him, or French kings, or kings whose main aim, was glory and the preservation of a unequal evil version of order. It matters, it matters allot, as does the body count, as every life matters, even if you are not good at maths, and can not compute what all this means. The truth is brilliant, and fantastic, that utopianism, equality, fraternity and liberalism, did achieve something, that trying to be nice did makes a better world. So that is a great fact for all decent people. Monarchy is statistically and ideologically more murderous than any left wing ideology.

There is no doubt the ideal of Communism, is better than the ideal of monarchy and the ideal of fascism, That is why Fascism, and monarchy each a side of the same anti-equality coin, has killed more than all the left wing regimes, in the world ever put together in the 20th C alone.

Fascist regimes include the Nazis, and 1920s-30s KMT, and the British Empire on this list alone.

Yes monarchy has killed more if you add this list together than Fascism, but other fascist regimes of the century, included 1930s Italy which caused a million deaths, and 1960s-90s Indonesia, whose terrible satanic style regime killed a million, this sort of drip drip effect means that monarchy finishes just level with fascist in 100s of millions killed. You could say of course that all fascist regimes were monarchial as they had a similar theory on why they should rule, and that all monarchial states were fascist as they also agreed with similar things. I know these facts will shock people who have grown up being taught the lie that Stalin killed more than Hitler, I don't know why anybody wanted to believe that, its insane, or that monarchy has never hurt a fly, thats another insane belief.

This is the first site to realise flu killed so many, and so the WW1, and such did. Well I realised it, and put it on a few websites. Which has helped my site allot.