Worst regimes of the 20th century essay

My list of the TOP 10 most evil regimes of the 20th Century in terms of deaths essay

1. Nazi Germany 38 million deaths,
in World War Two, and the Holocaust,
2. Imperial Germany 34 million deaths,
by causing WW1, and the 1917 Flu, and the colonial depradations, in Africa.
3. Imperial China 28 million deaths
by the 1900s famines, and slavery,
4. Imperial Japan 27 million deaths,
by WW2, and the colonial oppressions
5. Imperial Russia 24 million deaths,
by helping cause WW1, and numerous famines, and the Iranian famine of 1917
6. Communist China 22 Million deaths
By famines, and democides

7. Communist USSR 21 million deaths,
By famines, and oppressions
8. Imperial Austria 17.5 million deaths,
by helping cause WW1
9. The demon Belgian king 15 million deaths,
By inflicting the Congo empire democides,
10. British Empire 12 million deaths
By numerous famines, and wars in the early 20thC

10 KMT 12 million deaths in WW2, and other oppressions

So here is this list, the facts are that Communism, is not the worst idealogy, I am fed up of people saying it is.

People say that British people should demonise Stalin as much as they do Hitler, but Hitler was far worse. And the Soviets had nicer aims. Some try and claim the Soviets kileld more than the Nazis, but they did not. the worst is that book that lists all the Communist deaths, then has at the bottom, a admission some opf the stats may overlap, after doubling deraths, and such.

There is no doubt Communism, killed less than the Nzis, in Europe. and the only reason for saying otherwise, is an attemopt to pretend trade unuions are worse than racism. Added to this twhy in Britain do we not demonise empire, it killed far more milions than a Communist land 1000s of miles away. It is important we tell the truth rather than just claim Hitler killed less than Stalin, to shock leftists into opposing him,. All this does is make people want to defend Stalinm, and push us to evil policies.

And if we demonise Communism why not demonise The Kaisder, that weas a bad felloe. Surely the kaiser had worse aims than Stalin and killed more. And surely Communism, had better aims, than imperialism, and produced a better society than it.

The thing that is really bad, is how rightists always say oh the killings after culloden do not matter, oh tyeh Highland clearances should be forgot, oh the jkaiser, and emkperor of japan, should be forgiven for their actions. or not be held resposnible,. Then tehy endlessly claimk all leftists are responsible for the tiny reign of terror, and Stalin, even though rightuists kileld loads more than the left.

In the late 19thC the tsars decided to calim all Jewqs, ere tyeh reason for tehir ousting, and theri allies wrote the elders of zion as of this, claiming all leftists are jews, so in the 1940s killed loads of Jews. They do it like that ll the time, they try and pretend all left wingersa are communists and then hate them for it, trying to ptrend that any l;efty is evil, while racists liek them are not.

Lefties have nothing to be ahsamed, of wanting a better world, but rightuists do, in accepting all the bad, except when they fgeel like it then killing loads, then saying all change is wrong, then raadically changing society endlessly in theri image, and keeping all evil.

Lots truy and claimk stalin and hitler are the same, but they are not, just as Queen Victoria, who caused millions of deaths and the kaiser are not the sam,e as stalin or hitler. they are different and Hitler was far worse.

If Britain needs to demoinise stalin as much as Hitler, we should demoinise OUR evil rulers too, and other evil rulers, who killed more.

The proof of how wrong this is, is that it createslies io history,

Like when certain people want to calim Stalin was anti-semitic, this is insane he was bad, but he was not, He opposed it, and to cvlaim otherwise, is crackers, it is like saying King Charkles hated arrtistiocrats and tried to massacre them, all, and kaiser wilhelem, invaded China and massacred all it's people, it is a lie it is a lie History should tell the truth communism, was bad, buit not as bas as Nazis, or m,onarchial dictators, that is that..

It is time people told the truth about genocide, not just cover up right wingers crimes, and trying to pretend that left wing and reights wing dictators, were as bad as eacjhotherm, in what is aesentially a silly fatalist view.

About the Soviet Genocide in UKraine, one minute they claim it was caused by socialist mistakes, then by deliberate Holocausts, exactly like the Nazis, why not just make their minds up, it's not fair how left wingers world wide have to be tarred with the brush of the Ukrainian famine, buit Right wingers are not tarred with the brush for things they did, I.E king of japan, kings of britain.

Some people, make the ridiculous lie that people never talk about Stalin. and try and say we should hate Stalin as much as we hate Hitler, then compare how people wear Communist insigtnias, but if people wore Nazi stuff they would be treated with disgust. Well what about how people are allowed to wear monarchist stuff, and be monarchist, and support the British flag, which saw so many millions die, and US flag, and every other flag, why don't these people moan about that.

I think it is ujfair.

The truth is the left is better than the right.

That is prooven by how Britain's worst crisis in the 20thC were against right wingers, the Kaiser, who caused a million British deaths including the 1917 flu,l and Worl War Two, who caused 400,000 deaths. Our history books then talk about Hitler and demonise him, as he saw so many British dead. But then insane people try and pretend we should demonise Stalin as much as we demonise Hitler, why?

Its as they want us to think extreme left wingers and extreme right wingers are as bad eachother.

This is pointless, as they do this, then do not say that they are not the same,

The same people who say they were the same, then are often the same people who claim Mussolini and Hilter were not the same, and Hitkler and Osswold Mioseley even though they thought they were the same, and everybody at that time thought they were.

And if they want to demonise Stalin, why not demo nise the Kaiser, or King Leopold, or the Japanse emperor,. or KMT, or British Empire.

All these people who want to go on about Stalin, to do is blame left wingers, and say see Hitler was not that bad, left wingers killed many peopl;e too,.

Or they want to say, see all leftists should feel guilty, but no royalists shopudl feel huilty abou their crimes.

And to say Stalin and Hitler are tehs ame, is rubbish,

This is just a lying silly version of pacificm, which has no moral; fibre. Yes they both kuilled people, but they were from opposiste spectrunms.

To say otherwise makes extreme right wingers claim yess Hitler and Stalin were tehs ame, they were both left wing. And that sort of personm, just never remembers that they killed loads of other people, via right wing dictatorships.

And no extreme left winger really has the low of the lowness to pretend Stalin was not left wing of course he was, and we should bne ahasmed, just liek as human beings we know we can be wrong, we know the left can be wrong.

For Britain to demonise Hitler and SDtalin as it's jhate figures is very very wrong, and biased to the right.

Our hate figures should be tehy p[eople who attecked us, I.E Hitkler and the Kaiser,

If we demonise Stalin, and not eth other evil dictators, who killed more than him, this is a lie, just to make British people believe a lie that the extreme left and extreme right are the same,. they are not. Like when Berlesconi makes staements lying claiming Mussolinui never kileld a ny Italian, whyen he killed at least 100s, in peace time, and then thousands in wartime, and tehn he tries and calims, all his oppnemts are Communists and that they are so guilty of Stalin#'s genocicde. So in other wordsa, he supports some guy in own land that killed people, and hates people in his own land, who did not, but blames them for other;'s crimes.

People always say thinsg like, "no one remembers the Ukranian famine". when it is probabaly the second most mentioned genocide of the 20thC, after the Holocaust,. but then never mention what the Nais, did in Ukraine to locals, and how more Ukranians died in World War Two, tahn of eth Ukrainain famine. And how so many Ukrabnians died in Worl War one, and under the pogroms of certain people.

Its all to make us think in Britain that we should demonise Stalin with Hitler, We already have somebody to demonise, we already have somebody to say, "see you should not kill people", but some people, insaleny want us to pretend Stalin and Hitler were the same.

And the worst thing is this, wheareas the left use the Holocasut to say, see racism, is wrong, anti-semitism, is wrong, right wingers use it for their petty money grabbing ways, even if the way Stalin killed somebody was for national;istic reasons, I.E claiming the NHS is stalinist, claimiong trade unions are stalinists, claiming centre left parties, are communists, and so Stalinists, I.E1954, in the US, and 2006, in Italy.

I am sure I have a good point here.

left wingers are tarred with a brush of being bad,

Liek I heard a radio programme about socialist workers party activists and Islamic fundementalists, the prohrramme man, a British person, claimed he found the Sopcialiost workers party people scarty, all thwey were doing was gopin on may day parades, they zsaid nothing scary.

And tehn the same people always do not care about crime sof monarchies, and aristocrats, the crime sof the people who comitted the Higjland clearnaces are called the past, the people who inherit that land, allowed to give big speels, on the media, about how it was not that bad, and an effort to improve societym, when it was not, it weas a effort to make money for them, and they cvould not give a fuck about the rest, Yes it would be unfair to hate them today for that, but is very unfair, to pretend all left wingers should be opposed for the revolution, and all British Republicans hated for executing a evil tyrant who desrved execution in 1648, but that p0eople who are actually rich as of genocidal acts should be seen as just forgiven,

Surely the people who are rich as of bad stuff sahould feel guilty, AND IF NOT THEN THEY SHOUDL BE TOLD OFF, and left wingers should feel proud we ousted a very murdeous Russian tsar, and Nazi German leader, We should only feel guilty if we do not oppose what happened. But the fcat is left wingers do oppose what happened under stalin, most rightists never oppose Chinese Emperor, they think poor old Chinese and Jpaanese empoer's or poor old Russian tsar, they are the ones who need to have the patronising lessson,s not us., they are the ones, who people should be scared of, for killinmg so many, they are tehg ones, who need to be feared

As they killed, and saved nobody

* I finished this list in 2006 or 2007, after work on it in the early part of the decade, now I return to it in December 2009, very very proud, of what I did, really it was to do with me coming from a left wing family, andf me trying to answer points I wanted to about the fall of comunism, and Communisms crimes, the guilt I had about it, while still knowimng left wing ideals are a must and correct, and I say, there are some points I would like to correct but it is nostly accurate, I would say the only error is a gaping, error, that of the early 20th Century Chinese famine, for all the other stats, I worked cvery hard and got good info, but really the Chinese famine, I had a very strong belief that the right were very vbiased in terms of history which is true, they do docer up things, they do mislead, and are very very manipulative, I make good points to do with that on my Highland Clearances statements, like when they pretend it never happened but conveniantly know loads of stuff about it, so they may say but how did this happen, how did the population of the Highland go up, then when you answer that question sensibly they go onto another thing, I mean if these people knew the fact is the Highlands population went up, but much less than the rest of Britain, what else are they deliberately forgetiing, lots of rightists do this on loads of things, they feign ignorance on many issues, and claim some uniknown rightist knows all the factsm, or is the only person who knows the issue, or even claim all lefvties are people who just have little knowledge on the subject, and when they find out we know more, they peretnd we should just foregt the whole issue after all, well I have the facts, and have the proof, all the top 10 up there are proven to be that, the worst in terms of numbers of deaths, the flu, the congo, the empires, the famines, one fault is glaring though, the Chinese famine, and the reason why, well I read somewhere a famine, killed something like 20 million or so people in 1905-07 in the 1907 famine, I near the end of my essay was thinking, well unlike the other disasters, there does not seem to be much data or books, on this, all the others have entire books, by great writers scholarly saying how it happened, but for the Chinese famine of 1907 when apparently 20 milliobn died, nothing seems to mention it, at the time I finished I thought well, there was a famine, at the end of the 19th Century in China, and start of the 20th Century, and if you look at the facts there were famines across the 1900s, in China, and maybe the famine is not mentioned as rightists want to cover it up, but really in reality you just have to accept the facts stated, or you are beleiving in conspiracy theories, and surely my other facts are so in line with the truth and what scholars have discovered this should be too, so I have looked and really 20 Million is not stated in all that many accounts, just like I saw some sources claim millions died in famines in Russia in the 1900s, and I had to discount that, even though they were in quite reputable encyclopedias, no real sources confirm that, so lets see, in reality yopu can blame the Chinese monarchy for famines in the Late Victorian era, the real proof that it is unlikely there was a big famine in 1907 is that in other eras population charts show population decline, or low growth, like in the late 19th Century, or 1950s, yes it is possible there could be population growth in a famine era, and vice versa, but lets see we could say there were deffinatley many famine in the Chinese imperial era, and also slavery and poverty, and also a Chinese general claimed to be emperor, and remember thats how the other emperors came allot, just some military leader, or foreign army leader claiming to be emperor, then being regarded as emperor, so he is as much blue blooded as any other emperor, so you canj blame him for some deaths, and China had many flu deaths, and maybe you copuld blame him partly as of this and the destablising by him as a emperor, for many of the warlord era deaths, or not, lets say China's imperial era is on 12 Million too at least,, so make it equal 10th with the British Empire, and the KMT, just above in terms of deaths, I read somewhere else 4 million died in famine in 1907 in China, and there deffinatley were famines in the 1900s, I mean they were a cause of the overthrow of the emperor, but then again, often there are not revolutions in immense famines, i.e 1770 France a million dead, or 1840s Ireland a million dead, as the people are maybe too weak to revolt, though sometimes they do revolt in these cases, I was able to see on Google 5000 died a day in one famine in China in 1907, if anything judging from Google Archives, 1907, Russia had more famine deaths than I thought, 30 Million were suffering in 1907, I still believe that it is the rifght who cover up history , then claim their stuff is forgotten, look how they talk of the reign of terror in Britain, and Cromwells killings, but ignore killings by royalist armies in Berwick in the 1290s, the massacres during the Indian Mutiny in tens of thousands by Britain's colonial so anti democracy and anti equality forces, deaths in the Bristol riots, deaths of French soldiers in British prisons in Britain, and the Med, in tens of thousands in the 1790s and 1800s, and the only things mentioned about France in some British history books are the reign of terror, but not the French royalist rights' massacres of the communes in 1870, killing more than the reign of terror, the massacres by the right in Naples in the era of the French Revolution, in Poland, too, by the Tsar, and Charles I's armies kills in England, and Scotland, and Ireland, then like a chippy rightist as ever they claim the lefts crimes are for\gotten and they never mention the right's crimes in the Civil war, look at the right in England, anglo-centric, except when its the civil war in the `1640s, then they foregt massacres by royalist armies in Bolton, and South West England, in the thousands, and concentrate on Cromwells massacres in Ireland (which all should be mentioned of course) , a land they ignore mostly in their history books, but then they forget Ireland when it comes to Elizabeth's army's massacres, in Ireland or massacres by other royal leaders, in Ireland, or Scotland, purely as they oppose cromwell not as really as he was a tyrant but as he was not the king, they then try and cover up loads of oppressions of the Irish by kings and right wing regimes across the rest of history, the Irish famine is not mentioned all that much really when you think about how it affected Britain's demography, the selective right wing reading of history is atrocious, but anyhow, thats why we must always seek new facts about right wing crimes, and query the claims against left wing ones, but accept the crimes comitted by left wing regimes, and yes also righrt wing ones, as from that we can learn from history, and see what is the right way to rule etc, learning from history is very important, and the right try so hard to cover up crimes by themselves, as they are still needing to claim those regimes of terrible rightists were good, as their views depend on this while the left can renew anew, and move to their dream of a fre and equal society, which all history proves is right to aim for and right to believe in, my history lounge below proves this, it is the right who try to cover up allot of history, look at how in Britain in this anglo-centric land, the right claim the reason the Ukranian famine is talked of less than the Holocaust is as of left wing bias, when really it was as Britain was fighting ijn World War Two, and the Holocaust was in World War Two, a war Britain and the USA fought in, so to talk of the Ukranian Famine, as much as the Holocaust would not have been in with the Britain-Centric reading of History, Britain understandibly has, I believe in a history where we look at the whole world, but the idea we have history books, that just look at British history and things that were connected to events Britain was a major part in, is ok, but the idea we also add weirdly the reign of terror, and the crimes of Stalin, but not the crimes of King Leopold, or massacres by other rightists not directly at that time connected with British events, is just in my view a slanted inacurate history, a biased one, which tries to claim, the left is bad and the right good, \and even then despite the fact that is how our history books are, the right having a bias in their favour, as the right in the guise of Hitler comitted the Holocaust, but if all the other heinous crimes of rightists were mentioned too, and the rest of world history too, that would be correct too, but thene again, maybe a bit blood thirsty, it has to be said, histopry was not just genocide all the time, humanity has allot of game theory in it, but really history should be saying the crimes of the right as much of the left, bnut saying how the right comitted more crimes, and mentioing things to do with society what clothes people wore, wbhy democracty anjd fairness is correct how there were fascinating cultures in the past using how history is a amazing wonder like nature at times, in terms of amazing cultures, but also saying how democracy is right and equality and freedom, mentioping the genocides but also the good stuff, like trade and fun and great stories, and lots, well we should know about genocides but also lovely images like of Neolithic homesteads, amazing animals in Britain in the Mesolithic, well maybe people do not have the time to know everything, but there is so much to know, but the thinge people should know are the true stuff, and that is proven by my list well I cant decide everything and do not need to, but that is my point well made. It is the bias of the right that drew me to feel the C\hinese famine deaths may be asmuch as some claimed, but I have to take a impassioned, but fair look at history and the stats prove it was less than I said up there they are down to 10th, but still monarchy and right wing ideals are proved to be the worst as flu deaths may have been even worse than priorly stated. So much history detrimental to the right is covered up, i.e famines in Russia in the 1900s, so that is that this the finest website in the world, even the Hawaii man updates his info every so often this is accurate

Here are some more sites, there are books and articles on the subjects in many internet places, or internet book shops, bookstores, at the bottom, are lists of which were the worst regimes of the past few centuries.

A link to 100s of websites http://www.lonympics.co.uk/

An Index with links to almost all our sites.

Which regimes killed the most people in the 19th Century, find out here, http://www.lonympics.co.uk/The%2010%20most%20evil%20regiomes%20of%20the%2019th%20centrury.htm

A site on the El Nino Famines that killed 10s of millions of Indians, and Chinese and others in the 19th Century

A site stating which ideal killed the most in the 20th Century, the answer is royalism, and Fascism, and that the left saved a billion people in the 20th Century

The Highland Clearances and it's full terribleness

A site on the Belgian Congo, and how the king of that land killed 10s of millions of Congolese

Why the French Revolution was good

The most evil regimes of the 19th Century

A site on 1640s Britain

Worst 18th Century regimes

What were the nicest regimes ever