The Battle of Bannockburn

The Battle of Bannockburn ( Blàr Allt a' Bhonnaich in Gaelic ) (June 23–June 24, 1314) was a significant Scottish victory in the Wars of Scottish Independence. It was the decisive battle in the First War of Scottish Independence.

Prelude
Around Lent of 1313 Edward Bruce, brother of the Scottish king, began the siege of Stirling Castle, commanded by the English king's Sir Philip Mowbray. Unable to make any headway he agreed to a pact with Mowbray. If no relief came by midsummer 1314 he agreed to surrender. By this arrangement he may have believed that he had bought a cheap victory; for it was now two years since an English army had come to Scotland, & Edward II had so recently been on the verge of war with his barons after the murder of Piers Gaveston in the summer of 1312. Yet this was a challenge that could not be ignored in the same way that the bleeding of northern England had.

Click here to view cottages in the Bannockburn area for rent

Stirling was of vital strategic importance & its loss would be a serious embarrassment. The time allowed in the Bruce-Mowbray pact was ample for Edward to gather a powerful army. According to the historian & poet Barbour, King Robert Bruce rebuked the folly of his brother but similar agreements were a normal part of medieval war, & Dundee had probably fallen to the Scots through a similar arrangement in 1312. Mowbray had a breathing space & looked forward to the summer of 1314. In England Edward & his barons reached an uneasy peace & made ready.

Edward comes north
Edward came to Scotland in the high summer of 1314 with the notional aim of relieving Stirling Castle: the real purpose, of course, was to find & destroy the Scottish army in the field, & thus end the war. England, for once, was largely united in this ambition, although some of Edward's greatest magnates & former enemies, headed by his cousin, Thomas of Lancaster, did not attend in person, sending the minimum number of troops they were required to by feudal law.

Even so, the force that left Berwick-upon-Tweed on 17 June 1314 was impressive: it comprised between two & three thousand horse (likely closer to two thousand) & sixteen thousand foot, at least two or three times the size of the army Bruce had been able to gather.

Edward was accompanied by many of the seasoned campaigners of the Scottish wars, headed by the Earl of Pembroke, & veterans like Henry de Beaumont & Robert Clifford.

The most irreconcilable of Bruce's Scottish enemies also came: Ingram de Umfraville, a former Guardian, & his kinsman the Earl of Angus, as well as others of the MacDoualls, MacCanns & Comyns. Most poignant of all came Sir John Comyn of Badenoch, the only son of the Red Comyn, who had grown up in England & was now returning to Scotland to avenge his father.

This was a grand feudal army, one of the last of its kind to leave England in the Middle Ages. King Robert awaited its arrival south of Stirling near the Bannock Burn.

The English army marched rapidly towards Stirling to be there before Mowbray's agreement expired on June 24. Edinburgh was reached on the 19th & by the 22nd it was at Falkirk, only 15 miles short of its objective. Edward's host followed the line of the old Roman road, which ran through an ancient forest known as the Tor Wood, over the Bannock Burn & into the New Park, a hunting preserve enclosed at the time of Alexander III.

Bruce's army had been assembling in the Tor Wood, an area providing good natural cover, from the middle of May. On Saturday June 22, with his troops now organised into their respective commands, Bruce moved his army slightly to the north to the New Park, a more heavily wooded area, where his movements could be concealed & which, if the occasion demanded, would provide cover for a withdrawal.

Bruce's army, like William Wallace's before him, was chiefly composed of infantry armed with long spears. It was probably divided into three main formations.

Thomas Randolph, Earl of Moray, commanded the vanguard, which was stationed about a mile to the south of Stirling, near the church of St. Ninians, while the king commanded the rearguard at the entrance to the New Park. His brother, Edward, led the third division, & a fourth nominally under the youthful Walter the Steward, but actually under the command of Sir James Douglas

Bruce also had a cavalry force of some 500 men-at-arms under Sir Robert Keith, which was to play a small but crucial role in the coming battle. In an 18th century romance version of the Bruce Legend, the Knights Templar distinguished themselves at the Battle of Bannockburn on the Scottish side; however this is unquestionably a later addition (c. 1700) to the account. Bruce was at that time excommunicated & the Templar Order had recently been dissolved in most of Europe, so a common speculation was that many Templars had fled to Scotland to be away from Papal control.

The army might have numbered as many as 9,000 men in all, but probably more of the order of 6,000-7,000. It was gathered from the whole of Scotland: knights & nobles, freemen & tenants, town dwellers & traders: men who could afford the arms & armour required.

Barbour tells us that King Robert turned away those who were not adequately equipped. For most such equipment would consist of a spear, a helmet, a thick padded jacket down to the knees & armoured gloves. It is highly-probable that a large proportion of the spearmen would have acquired more extensive armour given that the country had been at war for nearly twenty years.

The balance of the army consisted of archers & men-at-arms. Each of these troop types was indistinguishable from their counterparts in France or England. Many of the Scottish men-at-arms (recruited from the nobility & the more prosperous burgesses) served on foot at Bannockburn.

Since he landed in Ayrshire in 1307 King Robert had demonstrated time & time again that he was willing to take risks; but these were always measured & calculated. He had no intention of chancing all on the outcome of a day, as William Wallace had at the Battle of Falkirk. Almost to the last minute he was prepared to withdraw. He was persuaded to remain by news of the poor state of morale in the English army. But undoubtedly the most important factor in convincing him to make a stand was the ground which lay before him.

The Bannock Burn, over which the English army had to cross on the way to Stirling, & its sister streams flowed over the Carse of Stirling. A 'carse' is an area which is wet in winter, but hard in summer, & most of it was used for growing wheat, oats & barley.

With the trees of the New Park covering Bruce's army to the west, the only approach apart from the Pows to the east was directly over the old road from Falkirk. If this route, virtually the only solid ground on which heavy cavalry could deploy freely, were to be denied to the English, they would have no choice but to wheel right to the north-east, on to the Carse.

To force Edward to take this route Bruce adopted similar tactics to those he had used at the Battle of Loudon Hill: both sides of the road were peppered with small pits or 'pots', each three feet deep & covered with brush, which would force the enemy to bunch towards the centre of a dangerously constricted front. Once on the Carse the English army would be caught in a kind of natural vise, as the main action on 24 June was to show, with waterways to the north, east & south. Such natural advantages were not easily obtained, & were unlikely to occur again.

There is some confusion over the exact site of the Battle of Bannockburn, although most modern historians agree that the traditional site, where a visitor centre & statue have been erected, is not the correct one. Although a large number of possible alternatives have been proposed, most can be dismissed & two serious contenders can be considered

The area of peaty ground known as the Dryfield outside the village of Balquhiderock, about three-quarters of a mile to the east of the traditional site[5].
The Carse of Balquhiderock, about a mile & a half north-east of the traditional site, accepted by the National Trust as the most likely candidate[6].

First day of battle
It was on the old road that the preliminary actions of the Battle of Bannockburn took place on Sunday 23 June.

For the English, things started to go wrong before the first blow had been struck. Sir Philip Mowbray, the commander of Stirling Castle, who had observed Bruce's preparations on the road, appeared in Edward's camp early in the morning, & warned of the dangers of approaching the Scots directly through the New Park.

Mowbray also pointed out that there was no need to force a battle, as Edward was now close enough to the castle to constitute a technical relief in terms of the agreement with Edward Bruce. But even if the king was disposed to act on Mowbray's advice, it was already too late; for he was showing signs of losing control of his formidable but unwieldy host.

The vanguard under the earls of Gloucester & Hereford, appointed to joint command by Edward after a quarrel about who would take the lead - a compromise that satisfied no one - were already closing in on the Scots from the south, advancing in the same reckless manner that had almost brought disaster at Falkirk. Following the line of the Roman road, they crossed the ford over the Bannock Burn towards King Robert's division at the opening of the New Park.

There now occurred one of the most memorable episodes in Scottish history. Sir Henry de Bohun, nephew of the Earl of Hereford, was riding ahead of his companions when he caught sight of the Scottish king himself. De Bohun lowered his lance & began a charge that carried him out of history & into legend.

King Robert was mounted on a small palfrey & armed only with a battle-axe.[7] He had no armor on. As de Bohun's great war-horse thundered towards him he stood his ground, watched with mounting anxiety by his own army. With the Englishman only feet away Bruce turned aside, stood in his stirrups & hit the knight so hard with his axe that he split his helmet & head in two. This small incident became in a larger sense a symbol of the war itself: the one side heavily armed but lacking agility; the other highly mobile & open to opportunity.

Rebuked by his commanders for the enormous risk he had taken, the King only expressed regret that he had broken the shaft of his axe. Cheered by this heroic encounter Bruce's division rushed forward to engage the main enemy force.

For the English, so says the author of the Vita Edwardi Secundi ("Life of Edward II"), this was the beginning of their troubles. After some fierce fighting, in which the Earl of Gloucester was knocked off his horse, the knights of the vanguard were forced to retreat back to the Tor Wood. The Scots, eager to pursue, were held back by the command of the king.

In the meantime, another English cavalry force under Robert Clifford & Henry Beaumont skirted the Scottish position to the east & rode towards Stirling, advancing as far as St. Ninians. Bruce spotted the manoeuvre & ordered Randolph's schiltron to intercept.

Randolph's action was to be a sampler of the main contest the following day: unsupported by archers, the horsemen were unable to make any impression on the Scots spearmen, precisely what happened in the opening stages of Falkirk. But the difference now was that the schiltrons had learnt mobility & how to keep formation at the same time.

The English squadron was broken, some seeking refuge in the nearby castle, others fleeing back to the army. The captives included Sir Thomas Gray, whose son & namesake was later to base his account of the Battle of Bannockburn in his book, the Scalacronica, on his father's memories.

Second day of battle
The English army was still approaching Stirling from the south. Bruce's preparations had made the direct approach to Stirling too hazardous. Edward made the worst decision of all: he ordered the army to cross the Bannock Burn to the east of the New Park

Not long after daybreak on June 24, the Scots spearmen began to move towards the English. Edward was most surprised of all to see Robert's army emerge from the cover of the woods. As Bruce's army drew nearer they paused & knelt in prayer. Edward is supposed to have said in surprise "They pray for mercy!" "For mercy, yes," one of his attendants replied, "But from God, not you. These men will conquer or die."

One of the English earls, Gloucester, asked the king to hold back - but the king accused him of cowardice. Angered, the earl mounted his horse & led the vanguard on a charge against the leading Scots spearmen, commanded by Edward Bruce. Gloucester, who according to some accounts had not bothered to don his surcoat, was killed in the forest of Scottish spears, along with some of the other knights. The very size & strength of the great army was beginning to work against the King, as his army could not move quickly & lost a lot of time in getting into position

Bruce now committed his whole Scots army to an inexorable bloody push into the disorganized English mass, fighting side by side across a single front. A small force of archers added to the misery in Edward's army, which was now so tightly packed that if a man fell he risked being immediately crushed underfoot or suffocated. The knights began to escape back across the Bannock Burn.

With the English formations beginning to break, a great shout went up from the Scots, "Lay on! Lay on! Lay on! They fail!" This cry was heard by Bruce's camp followers, who promptly gathered weapons & banners & charged forward. To the English army, close to exhaustion, this appeared like a fresh reserve & they lost all hope.

The end had come & Edward, whose personal courage in battle had done nothing to make up for his fatal mistakes, was forcibly taken from the field by his personal bodyguard. Edward's enforced flight ended the remaining order in the army; panic spread & defeat turned into a rout. He arrived eventually at Dunbar Castle, from here he took ship to England. From the carnage of Bannockburn the rest of the army escaped as best they could.

Legacy
The Scottish victory was complete & , although full English recognition of Scottish independence was not achieved until more than ten years later, Robert Bruce's position as king was greatly strengthened by the events at Bannockburn. The Declaration of Arbroath, a almost republican and democratic statements was able to powerfullt stated soon too in 1320 saying Scots could oust the king when they liked, and were fighting for freedom. So something all Scottish people today can sign up to, whether having a preseident or PM, or whatever in a future Scottish Republic.. This article was written in May 2007, it's what they wanted, freedom for themselves and rights to change the leader, and so would anybody who was interested in politics you would think most of the time. So it helped the move towards equality and democracy in a way.

A modern, abstract monument stands in a field above the battle site, where the warring parties are believed to have camped on the night before the battle. The monument consists of two hemicircular walls depicting the opposing parties.

Nearby stands the 1960s statue of Bruce by Pilkington Jackson. The monument, & the associated visitor centre, is one of the most popular tourist attractions in the area.

In 1932 the Bannockburn Preservation Committee, under Edward Bruce, 10th Earl of Elgin & Kincardine, presented lands to the National Trust for Scotland. Further lands were purchased in 1960 & 1965 to facilitate visitor access.

"Bannockburn. Robert Bruce's Address to His Army." is also the title of a patriotic poem by Robert Burns.

Strength in modern estimates
about 6,500 Scots versus 20,000 English
Casualties
For Scotland unknown but light (estimates place around 200-500) For England about 9000

So in 1314, 18000imperial infantry, 3000knights, passing ambushes, to weaken them,
Met 5000Scots footers, 500knights, 2000small tenants, at Bannockburn, quite nearby,
Armies only let property owners fight big battles, officially,
English noble knights tried crushing pikemen by suicidal runs,
That were lined up in rows, in numbers of 1000s,
Holding these long spears out,
Some old articles claim there were 100,000 English and less than 50,000 Scots, this of course may be true, but some sources claim that there was not a possibility of this occurring, as of capability, and some other sources, maybe actually though they were capable of amassing such armies,

In the 3 Major battles In the 3 major battles, there were 35/55,000dead, 1/2 each,
More in guerrillas, raids, tiny battles, colonial murders, of more tens of thousands,
Maybe quite a high version of that number, maybe,
But the famines were caused by the way society was led,
Though the 1290s famines may have had something to do with the war,
So it would be right to estimate,
Over 10% of the Scottish population, equivalent died in the war,

But some were English,
And also low 10s at least executed massacred by Scots,
And high 100s to low 1000s, of other Scots by the English,
With democides, like that, not as massacres, caused by the English invasion,
This is an example of a brutal battle, that is not a massacre,

You could say it was worth it for Scotland, or not, maybe Scotland would have been oppressed for centuries like Ireland if it lost, or treated not all that badly but still badly like Wales was. The correct answer may be war is wrong,.or England's king should not have invaded he cvaused many 10s of thousands dead in English French and Weslh wars. Many tens of thousands died across the centuries in the wars, in Wales, and 10s of thousands in eaxh century to 1707 in Scottish English wars. So maybe it shows how much the need the European Union is.

An Index with links to almost all our sites.

The Highland Clearances & it's full terribleness

A Couple of pictures of Scotland's great scenery

A Multiple Choice Quiz on Scottish History

A History of the Border Reivers

William Wallace the Biography

Amention of the massacres of Berwick of 1296

A Multiple Choice Quiz on Scottish History

A site on the Scottish Empire, lands once ruled by Scotland

A site on massacres after Culloden

A site on 1640s civil war massacres in Scotland

A site on 1640s Britain