It is very important to history and the world that the facts stated
are correct. A classic example of this is about Emperor Hirohito, After World War
Two, the typical reverence of monarchy, and right words thinking of certain aspects
of world society, saw parts of American and western history books to believe a
myth that Hirohito was a good man, This was horrible, as actually Hirohito can
be blamed for 27 million deaths. The fact is Hirohito is the main man to blame,
the man at the top. So here is the proof, that Hirohito can be demonised. Firstly in the 1920s, the Japanese Emperor, Hirohito, tookover.
At that time Japan was moving towards democracy, and could have if it had a liberal
president moved towards liberalism. But in the late he tookover,
His first
bad act was to say that a 1920s Pm, who was investigating Japanese army moves
in China, should resign. This act gave a green light for Japanese army forces
who were protecting Japanese intrests in China, to act outside the norms of society,
and be able to invade and annex lands.
It is known for certain that he and
his family and the army supported a greater Japan, that would annex lands to the
South, for resources and imperial glory.
As of this the parliamentry sector
of society began to lose power. And the army was emboldened. The far right in
Japan, began to say that Japan, should base itself on so called traditinal Japanese
ideals, i.e things they had made up, such as emepror worship and a whole lot of
other mystical baggage.
As the depression came the army took more and more
power, and the emperor, accepted this,. Indeed by the early 1930s, the empeor,
allowed them to be the main rulers of Japan, The emperor can be blamed as he emboldened
the, asnd was their talisman. The talisman of the parliamentry lot, was Japanese
history then democarcy, but the talisman of the army was the emperor, then Japanese
history, and he allowed them to use him, as this.
In the mid 1930s, there
was attempted army coup by people who claimed to support the emperor, but something
happened which showed that they did not really when crunh comes to crucnh the
emperor had full authority, He put down this pro-imperial coup fearing it would
take over.
Across the 1930s, the Japanese army was fighting a war with China's
warlords, and KMT, appointing the deposed former Chinese emperor as their puppet
leader.
In 1937 a act which showed the proof that the media has a terrifying
bias in favour of the evil of monarchy occurred,
The Japanese army led by
the emperor's uncle in China, who had been leading the killings in China, in an
army that swore allegiamnce to the Japanese emperor, comitted the massacres of
Nanking., The emperor is said, by many records, to have been very much interested
in the 1937 invasion of China, a date some say should be rearded as the real date
of eth start of World War Two, as that is when he was looking over the fcats,
and some generals, even said he was too, interested for their tastes, and that
a emperor, should rule more from afar.
Anyhow, his uncle ordered that no
captives in Nanking be talen, alive, what followed was a massacre of between 200,000
and 600,000 people,
THE greatest proof that the US shirked, their hard won,
victory, and hard won rightr to punich the terrible monarchs, was what happened
after world war two, After world war two, their people executed a lower Chinese
official, and did not punish the unlce in any sense what so ever.
Anyhow,
lets get back to business, and travel to what was happening in Japan.
What
happened next was Japan's army was able to carry on making it's moves,
In
1940 the emperor, signed the pact that would push Japan, to allying with Italy
and Germany, he stated he had some misgivings about this, but did believe in this.
Just before Pearl Harbour the emperor made the decsion, that was most important
of all they decsions, that shows we can pla e him as the main killer of 27 million
people,
He had a choice between a Japanese PM, who was not for war with America,
and a choice of one who was for war with America. Lets face facts, if that possibity
of a PM, who was for war had not been chosen then lets face it, that would have
been as important as if some other lower official had been for war with say Brazil,
it would have not made any difference and Japan would have remained at peace.
Instead the emperor chose a PM, who was FOR war with America.
Then what happened,
lets see what happened Pearl Harbour happened, the act of war that then saw Japan
able to invade the Phillipines, Souith East Asia, and the Pacific, and went on
to see the US nuke Japanese cities. Well the fact is that Pearl Harbour was debated,
A classic act of how terrible the royalist histories were, was that some
people claim in some books Hirohito knew very little about Pearl Harbour, and
some even blame millitarists who it has later been found out, did not even know
that the event was being palnned, Indeed the emperor, was one of a very small
number of people, who knew Pearl Harbour was being planned. Indeed in the conference
the emperor, stated he supported the attack on America, on Pearl Harbour, if anybody
had the power to say he objected he did, but he did not, and in the end Japan's
invasion was sent, with planners knowing this was a gamble as America if it fought
back, would easilly win.
So anyway , in the next major step, the emperor,
congratulated the army for wins, and even at some time before or after recomended
biological warfare.
In all honesty the army, right wing that were for war,
who the emperor had opted to give power, (lets face it most kings hand power to
a advisor, as they do not come into politics with views, they have to opt for
a view, and all choose terrible views). Based their entire ideaological legitamacy
on declaring the emperor to be the God, leader, to follow, that is the fact that
is most devastating, Without monarchy their entire reason for ruling would be
different, they may have had to opt for democracy, and so never have been able
to base their voews on immorality, and milotarism, and so never killed so many
under the emperor,
So in the 1940s, the emperor supported the war, in 1945
there was a debate and one minister stated he wanted to surrender, but the emperor,
stated he wanted to carry on and the war was winnable,
The classic act of
the stupidity of the leadership was that they did not realise till late that the
Japanese were moving across the isles of the Pacific, towards Japan, insteads
of going via Indonesia, and China, which showed they were dumb,k The king abnd
his stupidity was like this, a cleverer leadrr like PRES, would have realised
the ewar was unwinnable,
the kamikaze pilots flew themselves into US ships
pruley in honour of the emperor,
In 1945 the US dropped atom bom on Japan,
The
most awful myth in history purpoitraed by Satan';s royalist vermin, is that Hirohito
made Japan surrender, This is terrifyinm, that a man and posistion that supported
the war, who caused such terrible treatment, and was the only man in Japan who
could have stopped the Asian part of World War Two, or made it occur, was then
given crdit by idiot,s a scumbag given credit for ending the war,
Actually
what happened was this, the cabinet voted, and by the time the emperor, voted
the vote was already for surrender, then the emperor stated he also wanted peace.
He also wanted to surrender.
Some say this makes him a hero but it does not,
,as there is the fact that in World War TWo, the allies made a desciosn, they
said to the Axis, they would accept nothing but unconditonal surrender, i.e the
ousting of the dictators, who had caused the massive wars.
But in the end
the Nazis, the Nazis, as the war nearewd conclison,m tried to make deal with the
west to make it let it stay in some form of power, But as Britain was so close
and the USSR, then this happily impossible,
With Mussolini, he could not be
negotitaed with as he was so alligned with Hitler, so he was crushed in that way.
But then along came the next problem, Hirohito, but the emperor, as the lowest
of the low, had a view, that he would cause a war of 10s of millons deaths, but
as the war neared a end, oh yes he'll negotiate. So as the war neared an end,
just before the atom bom, the Japanese refused surrender, but when the Americans
offered keeping the emeproee, but exactly the same surrender he acce[pted this
. In other words he allowed the atom bomb on Japan, just so he good keep his posostion,
So that is that satanic monatchjy Japan's monatrcbhy needs ousting,
Added
to this, some like to blame a Japanese PM, for this crisis, and he was executed
after the war by the US for war crimes, when history books show he was the most
loyal of all PMs, to Horohito, and based his legitamacy.
And with all this,. after undoubtably supporting the war, and seeing in 1945, most of teh cabinet already vote for surrender to America, in World War Two,
He made it sound like he had not even wanted war, and he was being profound, even though he had, undoubtedly. supported it, and everybody had already said it was opposed, Surely this shows a forgetful psycho element, of not accepting he was massively responsible. Unbelievably psycopathic.
British Prisoners of war were treated terribly under his rule, and he allowed that, in their 1000s, and that for loads of others too.
Herbert Bix writes good stuff on this subject. of the evil emperor of Japan,
Also I see in a papeer, typical crap by pro Hirohito, lots, claiming, the typical idea, that he the tsar, KAISER, AND eMPERORS, OF aUSTRIA, were simpletons, who did not know what they were doing,. unless they did sometjhhing good, in which case we should revere them for that evenm though a non biased non-royalist reading of history, states that these people killed millions. It said Hirohito stopped attending the shrine in Tokyo in teh 1970s, as it had war criminaols, and was so claiming he was against war, The fact is he attended it to the 1970s, and only stopped for PC reasons, Political Correctness, i.e not wanting people to think bad of him, when he did not mind people thinking bad of him, when helping millions get killed, talk about another act of utter hypocricy by this war emperor, And anyhow teh wear criminal he was taliking of, was a guy regarded as teh most loyal of his PMs, Tojo, who he appinted, If he had appouinted the candidate who was for peace, japan would not have had war with america, but hirohito appointed teh man for, war, There is allot of guff written about Hirohito, by people who are really only comparable with Holocaust debiers, they claim he was a wonderful; man, who just for peace, and always gbive these psycho statements he makes, ibn their books, about how he was for peace, But this psycho just showed what a psycho he was, I mean his uncle led the rape of nanking, another relative di dhorrific things to people in experiemnts with chemical weapons, he actually supported the bombing of Pearl Harbour, and refused to give support to Ministers, who wanted peace in the late period of teh war, till after most other people allready had, He supported teh war to annex much of China, These people who reverse, him so how biased they are, that he actually supports a massive war m,and they paint him as some brain dead simpleton, who only has a brain, sparking to life, when they can claim he does something good, of which all of which was meaningless crap. Such as that famous crap about the surrender, trying to portray him as teh only one who wanted peace, when teh cabinet was already majority for peace, And foregtting that Tojo, the war criminal, was his most loyal; supporter.
Here are some more sites, there are books and articles on the subjects in many internet places, or internet book shops, bookstores, at the bottom, are lists of which were the worst regimes of the past few centuries.
An Index with links to almost all our sites.
The Highland Clearances and it's full terribleness
A site on the Belgian Congo, and how the king of that land killed 10s of millions of Congolese
Why the French Revolution was good
The most evil regimes of the 19th century
Why it was right to punish Tsar Nicolas, Charles I, and the French Kings, even when right wingers call them martyrs, when they were murderers. Who deserved punishment just as much as any modern criminals. Or the crinminals of their time.
What were the nicest regimes ever
The Best regimes ever in terms of achievers
Worst 17th Century regimes ever
A site stating what have been the world's largest empires ever
What would happen in a war between these sides
What were the most evil regimes ever
A list stating what were the worst 1990s regimes
What were the worst 16th Century regimes ever
What were the worst 15th Century regimes ever
What were the worst 2000s regimes
A site stating the 10 largest majority English speaking lands, as their main tongue in the world
A site on space, and the records to do with this subject
A site on a time traveling revolutionary
The world's 10 most powerful countries in 2008
My Worst regimes of the 20th century essay
My worst regimes of the 20th century stats
Our History Lounge - Where you can peruse many fascinating historical articles.