Why are there so many horrible awful hideous bullies who use internet message
board or forum sites.
Why are there so many horrible troll internet bullies around who seem to use
internet message sites to bully victims. I have met some of the most horrible
people in my life on message board sites. Really awful skin crawlingly evil
attention seeking nasty bullies, who seem to think that a brutal obvious horrible
insult is a sign of witt. Well it is not. It is a sign of an attention seeking
hideous attention seeking evil mind.
Also I know that some manipulative types will tell me I am insane for being against bullying. There are allways patronising bullying scum who try to tell me I am insane for being against bullying. This just shows manipulative and evil they are. That they make an incredibly damaging statement like that and think it is useful advice. You're not being friendly or kind in telling someone you don't even know over the internet that they are insane. How on earth do you think that is advice. Making someone doubt their own sanity is offensive to do and can really push someone into insanity. Going around telling victims they are insane for being upset, is damaging cruel and vindictive, and you know that, that is why you do it. You are not helping anyone by giving out abuse like that. I have gone on internet sites and told people about how bullying is wrong and then been inmedialtely told i was insane. The funny hting is evtaully i worked out this qwss just a mnaiptuleve nasty patronising trick done by bullies to win an argument. And they don't make it as a sweeping statement, they try and pretend this a thought kind out view, and that they're saying it out of concern. Once I faced up to one of those sort of bullies on the internet after he patronisingly told me I was insane for making anti bully views. Well Idecided I had enough of sneaky bullying scum like that and decided i would not stand for it and realised he was just being offensive, so i naswerd back time after time to this bully, eventually Imanged to grind him down in the way he tried to grind me down, and i worked out of him the fact that he was a manipulative wife beater. And that he was just same as all the other awful hideous snide snobby patronsing bullies on the internet who use every manipulative trick they can to grind good people down. Let me assure you, this simple fact and it is allways the case, telling someone they are insane over an internet message board is an INSULT not advice. You are not in position to make offensive remarks like that as if it is just a trivial statemernt to make. Would you walk up toa grieving individual and tell them they were insane for being against abuse. Why are there so many awful hideous bullies on the internet prepared to use every manipulative snide ploy they can think of to bully. The worst think is they think it is useful advice.
Why am I not allowed to hate. There seems to be a view that among certain groups
such as the politica right, abusers, and even some pretend liberals that victims,
left wingers, and liberals aren't allowed to feel hatred to their abusers or
ideas of intolerance. I like to use internet message boards for discussions.
Whenever I try and use the boards to raise awareness on the issue about being
bullied, I get the impression that it is the view of many, that because I am
a victim I am not allowed to express any anger, hatred towards those who picked
one me. Whenever I express any anger or passion on the subject I get called
"hate-filled". As if I have done something terrible. I fully expected
this manipulative drivel from those who had been bullies in their life. It is
sick that they think that way. That first of all they bully and act snobbishly,
with a real sadistic pleasure to cause pain with a real desire to cause their
victim to kill themself. Yet if I ever express any anger or hatred suddenly
they regard me as the dangerous or wrong one. In reality I think we all recognise
whatever crime were talking about of course whether it's bullying, paedophillia,
rape, con artists. We all recognise, that those who commit those crimes are
always going to have the deranged reverse logic in their head. That they can
be snobby, racist, have contempt, hate, anger venom towards their victims, even
drive victims to the brink of suicide. But the moment a victim expresses any
anger, or justifiable bitterness suddenly the abuser will act like this is the
most terrifying, strange (but also in their words populist), and of course in
amazing hypocrisy will decide that we're not allowed to feel emotions. I know
that I've used message boards and been subjected to horrendous insults from
the types who bully expressing incredible anger and outrage simply at the sheer
gall of a victim speaking out against abuse. I call it immoral indignation.
Quite frankly they would express that even if I didn't express any of my anger.
But although it really hurts when that happens I recognise you cannot realistically
stop a deranged sadistic maniac who actually persuaded themselves to abuse in
first place to stop thinking their victims should shut up. I can also understand
that many right wing or anti gay campaigners, racists, or anti immigrant campaigners
are going to use the same logic, where they express the most offensive views,
often declaring that people of a certian race should be killed. So some individuals
in the groups they are attacking feel anger or bitterness back and shout back
in anger then suddenly, the right wingers will start blabbering on about "hate-filled",
and "tolerance", and the "victim-complex" As if we're all
supposed to tolerate being racially abused. As if racial abuse is some legitimate
freedom, for abusers we should all tolerate.
In fact one time after writing an article criticising wife beating to a magazine.
I received an e-mail back from the magazine claiming I was "hardly left
wing" because all left wingers were in her view "nice and docile".
When she said "nice" she meant it in the way that some sado mascochistic
pratts use "nice" as an insult for the likes of Cliff Richard, or
Tim Henman, or the characters Hugh Grant played in films like Notting Hill.
etc: You know many people in society really hate niceness, and for some deranged
sado machistic reason don't want any nice guys around. We all know that but
once again if you complain about those insults you'll get treated like a lunatic.
But in the end I understand there will always be offensive abusive pieces of
work who get pleasure abusing others, and then decide it is disgraceful they
get criticised for this. It is immoral indignation.
The thing that really annoys me is the pretend liberals.
You see this is the problem loads of offensive individuals seem to have an ideology
where they see all good men as boring, burdens, sad, etc for being nice. An
example of this is when you see film reviews, like in films reviewers when you
get that film critics cliche of a critic who claims they supported the bad boy
in film and sees the nice guys in the films as empty and bland. Well the reason
is they won't let the nice guys express any anger, venom, bitterness the deep
emotions that made them not want to abuse the tough moments in their life. The
moment anyone who supports a good cause expresses an anger and venom against
the abuser, suddenly we're told to shut up and go back to being bland. So in
other words it's a typical catch 22 situation that pro abuse individuals put
us in. If we don't express our emotions and anger we're told we're unemotional,
bland, burdens not worth caring about. Then if we express any venom, or passion
against abusers we're told that we're not left wing anyway, and that we're hypocrites
form some deranged logic, and the views are dismissed as a rant.
The reality is everyone has passion and anger, and hatred, but the left are
supposed to suppress it so the right can say we don't have any, and then taunt
us for that too. I am shy and quiet, and docile, but I feel deep anger at bullies
who wanted me to kill myself. Why on earth shouldn't I. Yet if I express that
loads of former bullies will decide that basically I need to be locked up a
in a high security mental hospital with a straight jacket in Alcatraz, and that
I need electric shock treatment to wipe my brain clear of all these scary emotions
of not wanting to get abused. The idea I'm not left wing, just cause I feel
anger at the those who abuse me, or those who abuse others, well that is just
sick logic. And it is something the right and abusers want to believe they want
to believe all left wingers don't have passion, so they can dehumanise us, and
dismiss our anti abuse reasoning as cold and inhuman.
This trend a new ideology pretend liberals. Pretend liberals are guys who claim
not to be racist, a bully, a snob when they are. So you get men spouting of
rubbish like I am not a racist but we should support the freedom of others to
racially abuse others, or arguing that bullying should be tolerated as part
of life. I mean that is just sick. How can you can be against racism and then
tolerate someone doing it. That isn't liberal. That's just a pro abuse form
of anarchy, or not caring about victims. Liberalism isn't about anarchy, or
supporting abuse. It's the opposite. It's about freedom to do whatever one wants
as long as it doesn't abuse others.
The recent Jeremy Hardy V BNP case showed this. Huge numbers of listeners wrote
in to the radio four show feedback to complain about Jeremy Hardy declaring
BNP members should be shot. Now what I found incredible was the passion that
the complainers wrote with, and not on the basis they were BNP members, but
on the basis they were liberals who passionetly supported freedom of speech,
and that racists should be protected. Well it's funny that you can bet they
wouldn't complain for black who beaten up by racists. What annoys me is the
pretend liberals don't understand that the BNP are going to cause deep anger
and bitterness in many. What do they expect, and that to stamp down or suppress
any anger directed to the BNP. How on earth can you expect to have a party that
supports racism, and then not expect that many in society will be bitter and
angry about that.
The pretend liberal wants to understand and even tolerate (or agree) with the
abuser, the racist, the wife beater, the bully, the snob), and then feel anger
and no empathy at all, at any victim who expresses bitterness or anger. So they
preach understanding for the abuser but suppression of the victim. I can see
that from those who argue that victims suffer from a victim complex ideology.
A common theme for pretend liberals is to argue that there is problem of a victim
complex. The pretend liberals decide victims must be told to shut up and suppress
ideas, emotions, memories, while all abusers are told to open up express, so
we can understand help. Basically a pretend liberal will want all victims to
accept being punch bags, for the abuser to get out their anger.
Now I know will be told that I'm being hypocrite or confused. Well I'm not.
My view is clear and concise.
I don't support abuse. I support victims. I am one. I feel anger and hatred,
and fear towards those who bullied me. I understand many victims of racism feel
the same towards racists. I don't agree with bullying. I feel there is no justification
for why they picked on me. There is no hypocrisy there. I am not hypocritical
for saying abusers should be hated, and victims should not be. It is not hypocritical
to hate some things but not hate the other group. For instance it not hypocritical
to support Winston Churchill, and to be against Hitler. There is no confusion
or hypocrisy. Liberalism is not about tolerating abuse, it is not even about
tolerating those who argue for abuse. The real liberals don't support abuse.
I am not the rapist, or paedophile, or wife beater, or murder, or even car theif,
or a bully, or a snob. So don't try and get all reverse logic manipulative on
me.