A Critique of the political views of Prince Charles
Prince Charles's views are sometimes seen by some as left wing, but actually he is right wing.
Look at his views.
He favours fox hunting, a cruel sport that hunts foxes to death, and was angry very angry when this was banned.
He often visits right wing dictators, and gets on very very well with them. For instance he is a freidn of most royals heads of state worlwide, and especially well on good relations with the oppressive kings of Saudi Arabia, The arrogant family who accept no blame for anything bad, and whose arroganat diresepcvt of others as weazeled its way into Bin Laden and helped cause Sep 11, As Bin laden was caused by them.
He also opposes meritocracy.
He said in a disgusting memo to a tribunal What is wrong with people nowadays? Why do they all seem to think they are qualified to do things far above their capabilities?
This is all to do with the learning culture in schools. It is a consequence of a child-centred education system which tells people they can become pop stars, high court judges or brilliant TV presenters or infinitely more competent heads of state without ever putting in the necessary work or having the natural ability.
It is a result of social utopianism which believes humanity can be genetically engineered to contradict the lessons of history.
In reality the lessons of history show that the peasants of the Middle ages, and hunter gatherers of the Mesolithic are today the reatest artists, writersd, thinkers, and inventors, there ever was. And he still think he has the right to blurt out nonsense on anything.
The annoying fact is how many famous people he befriends, and how he thinks he is clever enough to comment on things. To quote World Socialist Magazine, of his schooling, the expensive tutoring did not produce academic success. After completing his secondary education with barely average grades, the Prince scraped through his undergraduate studies at Trinity College Cambridge, where he managed to obtain a second-class degree in history. After massive spending on him. Far more than most people who get that well. Even Bush Junior did better than that.
Another annoying thing is the sort of right wing self proclaimed master race idiots who defend his tupidity, Morons like Lynn Truss, who seem to want the sort of apalling society of the 19th Century, when we had to look up to people who worse than us. They are a terrifying breed of bullies, who seem to think they are better for us, when they have caused nothing but harm. It is so annoying that these royals with such views have influence when his is a family of far stupider people than most people,. What sort of family so stupid it has royal its a knock out, or has a woman who belives there are "dark forces" in the world, like some loony who believes in aliens. Also Prince Charles is pals with loads of mad businessmen, Also Ben Elton a pal of him is going on about the same stuff. It is sick that there are still people who beleive that some people can not achieve anything, and can only be their servants it is sick and disturbing that that person is in line to be king, and disgusting. He is not left wing at all, he is classically right wing, and by saying these appalling bullying things he is encouraging idiots to say the same thing, and to send us back to and era, when lower class people, were regarded as inferior. It is disgusting. In my life I have noticed disgusting people who feel they are superior to me, with that same attitude and the most annoying are the psychopaths, who just think it whatever, Whatever I do. The same belief is at the root of racism, and and whole loads of evil beliefs. And what aboput this statement "the lessons of history" . Obviosuly then his view must be that the lesson of history is that lower class people are stupider, or that just some are. As if he has been in contact with all that many lower class people. The only lower class people he meets are people who want to be on good behaviour with him, so he knows nothiong about them. I have learnt in my klife that everybody basically has a brain capable of immsense things. Th eonly exceptions are the severly mentally disabled, and even they are capable of some things. He is taking the view that most people are essentially incapable, ,of rising up to their ambitions, When in reality most people in history who have made great achievements, were from some random, position never expected. Look at Thomas Eddison, the greatest inventor ever, look at themm all, It is the case, that everybody is capabale, of somthing great. His view is believed by some others. And when they take this view to you, it knocks, you down, in confidence you stop believing in your self. What makes you realise you shoudl ebelieve in yourself is that you are a human who can think great thinks, and do great things. How could a species of Mesolithic Hunter gatheerers that lasted through so long, be anything other than a species that sees that almost every person can achieve great things theoretically. How can a species of people, that included people who could survive with just their bands, be anything other than a species for which everybody can achieve great things. It would be impossible for it to be anything otherwise. How on Earth could it be, that a species that was able to hunt mammoths in groups of 40, and live in Artic winters, and Industrial factories, slums, Brazilian shanty towns, foster homes, past famine, and war, and so much, how could it be anything other than meritocratic species, for whom all the people can achieve great things. Whether it is to set up a business, or great a great book, or state what they believe, The fact is a monarch could believe nothing other than what he does, And that is how monarchy is evil, and wrong. When I was unemployed, I saw that even the other people on the dole could all read and write, and that lets face it is very useful for them, it helps them make money, keep it, look for jobs, and survive. But all the same most people in 10,000 BC could not read or write, The essential fact that this indicates will never get into the skulls of many degenerates in the royal family, of the thug loving Princess Margaret or the swastika wearing Prince, but it is a fact which is there you should realise what it tells you, it tells you something about human ability and about how the likes of Prince Charles are not something to revere, but just other people, like anybody in the street. No better at all. If somebody like him can get a degree from Cambridge anybody can. I could say, but what is that, it is not a insult, it is true, it is a achievement, but if he can get it, I respect the royals so little, I will leave the typos in, Monarchy will allways be like this. A system, where however left wing the monarch tries to be, he will always have to be believe in anti democratic anti Utopian beliefs, to be there, and always be there to spread these beliefs to left wingers and right wingers, and so harm society and the people. Which is why need a Great British Republic, where we do not have these annoying people, being on TV, and getting their appalling heart of their brain beliefs, into everything, in their absolutely dreadful ways,.
The way people say he is left wing, is also bad, as it means somebody who is devoted to antio left wing dreams, of opposing equlity and freedom, is of incfuence, Talking to this right wing US lovey dovey politicians, or that naive left winger. It is horrific wrong, and a threat to democracy and freedom worldwide.
The whole basis of left deals is equality, and to have royal titles is inequality, which only spreads that and causes a worse society.
Also it ios annoying the way the royals award thesemlves titles. Like the lord of the Isles was a ancient title of the Hebrides, what a great name, then in the 2000s, very annoyingly they award it themselves, ruining the history of the name, making it seem a right wing pal, of rich right wingers, and naive foolish people, is some kind of Scottish thing, or symbol of it, when he is just a right wing Imperialist, And title Prince of Wales, is too, Wales should not be be given away as a title, it is a nation, not somebody's tag line, it is better than that and as a left wing nation should not be a appendage English colony style name. That phrasology does not need changing it is the right statement being made, it means what I say. Very annoyiong and arrogant teh way they do this. Runing historical names, by associating their names to it, when they have nothing integral to them, they only thing they are is greedy and power hungry, and worship hungry, people who support them are moronic twits in my own opinion, who support something that has done nothing but bad and his no good,
And loads of right people in Wales who love inequality, and evil; like the title of Prince of Wales, so it would be a great defeat of evil, to abolish the title,. And it would be good, for the nice people in Wales who support equality and freedom, and liverty for people to have confidence in thesemlesv and not have some iddiot claiming power. Happily most people in Britain do not consider themselves subjects so I suppose we are a republic.
Is it not hypocrtical he moaned about beef on the bone being banned some say, and then some say said Macdonalds should be banned,
I
find it annoying some claim he is green, when actually all the so called green
things he has talked about have been of the mark. He never really talked about
global warming, and is pals with allot of blinkered abusive bullying flat earthers
who belive it is not ocurring, and who make such horrible insults, and hate campaigns
against people who are attacking global warming. And omse hwo honestyly say they
do not care if the world dioes out, but then on the other hand seem to indicate
they do not belive that, they are just stupid bullies who are to brainless to
know what is going on, just like they do not care about other people.
Some More sites below
Links to our 100s of websites, http://www.lonympics.co.uk/
A Multiple Choice Quiz on Socialism
The 10 Most Succesful politicians ever list
The Top 10 most successful lefties in 2006
A Site condemning Queen Victoria
What were the Worst regimes of the 20thC
A site condemning the bias against the left wing, in most history books.
A list of some socialist quotes
A site saying why tax should be high on rich people
Places named after Left Wingers, and left wing stuff
My site saying how French Royalists were the first terrorists
The Circulation numbers of 53 of the biggest selling newspapers in Britain in 1993
Who was Che Guevara, find out here
An Index with links to almost all our sites.
The Highland Clearances and it's full terribleness
A site on the Belgian Congo, and how the king of that land killed 10s of millions of Congolese
Why the French Revolution was good
The most evil regimes of the 19th Century
What were the nicest regimes ever
The Best regimes ever in terms of achievers
Worst 17th Century regimes ever
A site stating what have been the world's largest empires ever
What would happen in a war between these sides
What were the most evil regimes ever
A list stating what were the worst 1990s regimes
What were the worst 16th Century regimes ever
What were the worst 15th Century regimes ever
What were the worst 2000s regimes
A site stating the 10 largest majority English speaking lands, as their main tongue in the world
A Website which is essentially a action packed cool dood extravaganza of fun
A site on space, and the records to do with this subject
A site on a time traveling revolutionary
The world's 10 most powerful countries in 2008
My Worst regimes of the 20th century essay
My worst regimes of the 20th century stats
Our History Lounge - Where you can peruse many fascinating historical articles.