The crimson book of Royalty 6

The second last of these websites.

Arguments why monarchy is wrong.

Monarchy claims to be a mini master race

It beats the idea that all people should be entitled to equality, in the biggest blow possible.

So monarchy is real bad,

Heres some more comments from some people I have recievd

Someone said, they were Montenegran and said they had as much right to claim to be king of that country infact more than some guy whose lived in another land for so long,

Another said he actually was, whether he was or not, and said the king was an imposter,

Another said, that he was a Thai who was fed up fo the Thai King, who has done nothing what so ever for his country apart from nothing, standing still like a statue, while his land has terrible child abuse by certain confident talkative people, and so he calls the king king bumpole, the wortless drag queen, at least drag queens normally he says try to do something which is about humanity, not about claiming to be the superior race, and being, He later said that the 2007 King of Thialnd is called King Bum Hole, or something so all royalists are sucking up to his bum hole, ho ho so true,

Another said he will never forgive royalisnmm for casuing all that terrorism, we have now,

Another said, monarchy is evil, it despises the principle of fanfare to the common manm, and belives in the principles of glory to satan,

Yes that is a good point, even the British monarchy has done no good what so over in the past 50 years, and many of it's, senior members wanted to surrender to the nazis,

Another evil thing about the, is their supporters allways do not allow any opposition, they say things hateful to republicans, especially in the 1990s, before Republ;icans realised how right we are,

King Bum Holes of Thailand, his supporters are bumholesists

British king and queens have burned people, alive, like James V1 and Queen Mary , and our presnt queen, is a bit mad, like when she did that thing to do with Burell, the butler, at that court case, and got away with what essentially was a terrible act, then she horribly claimed dark forces were around, when she weas doing the dark thing. She has never donme anything for anybody but her own reign. Ok she is not that bad, but its wrong to revere her. as that is not republican,.

And some people say Constitutional Monarchy is good, but come on all the constit moarcjhies are powerlerss pointless monarchies, which are only sucefful states as teh monarch has no power, and if they do have any bad stuff occurs, the less monarchist, or dictatoral lands were the more successful since 1900, and before, and those least monarchial led in 1900, are most sucesfdul tioday,

Added to this absolute and constitutional are similar i.e Japan and Germany where ruling monarchs are claimed to have been powerless by some rightists in ww2 and ww1, as too Belgium under King Lepolod, where King Leopold just made his own state and killed loads that way, or Arabia where some rightists claim teh Whabi sect of Islam, is causing all the bad, and the powerful super rich monarchy have no power, when really the Wahabi sect do really what they are told when push comes to shove, and is influenced massively by the monarchy, concstit monarcbhy is dangerous i.e Edward VIII, and The King of Nepal, a nd of course how the Dutch monarch's husband proposed in some views to be Leader of teh Netherlands under teh Nazis,

Some Canadians claim monarchy makes them have a identity all they are saying then is that they have no culture, as apparently they are Americans with the British head of state in that view, which is crazy surely Canada is it's own land, with it;s own democratic history, not to do with a monarch who does nothing for teh copuntry, but to do with it's own people

Royalism is pro dictatorship as it can not accept anything wrong with it, unlike democratic regimes, which will never be able to claim that a ruler is perfection, and not the reason for anthing bad, Also the Queen in Britain complained when the Royal Mail changed it's name, but did not when 1000s of post offices were shut, harming the lives of loads, as they represent monarchy not the people,

too many republicans revere monarchy, like they are pals, when they do not do this for other strangers

Good definitions of Nazis, are people who support monarchy, racists, and people who think anybody who dissagres with them is a Communist

http://www.lonympics.co.uk/thecrimsonbookofroyalty7.htm A link to the last of this 7 strong site, the last line, of my views, plus adverts for my other sites.

A History of British Republicans

I am also fed up of British monarchy putting itself into everything, wnhy can't we be a pure republic, rather than have the monarchy having to stick it's feet into every cvharity and football association to get the credit for their wins and sucesses, it has nothing dto do wththem, as someone said right wingers as another ter, for right wankers, another thing I hate is how royalists say Mussolini and Hitler are not the same, but Staklin and Hitler were, and how ehen you say how the Kaiser and Hitler were very much the same, they deny that truth, also many Balkan self proclaimed kings claim to be king of all serbs, someone told mme they would fight this move on teh streets, and that actually the scum are kings of no serbs, or even anywhere else, as they are opposed by most people, a nd rightly,

Monarchy is evil, all sanctified monarchs were evil greedy scumbags, who were snctified as they were corrupt. Monarchists are scum who do not care about the people, I heard on the tv someone say the Ottoman Enpire should have been kept, this as histiory never telles us monarchy did bad. It killed millions of Arm,enians, Bulgaerians, Greeks, Turks, and Lebanese, in the 50 years before it's fall, it failed the Turkish people, and nobody talsk about this,

Also I am fed up fo loads of programmes recently claiming the Persian monarcjhy that lost to Alexander the Great, was one of peace, It was not , it raided so far it reached Romania, killing, and killed loads across many lands, the first empire to kill in 3 continents, it was not one of peace, so called anti war people,

In every part of history, we are not taught how bad monarchy was, and every single time monarchy is talked, of, people say oh the Ottomans were fgood, or the Kaiser was good, or all that, saying if the Kaiser was kept in power in the 1920s, then Hitler would not have come to power, This is mad, as the Kaiser caused a war as big as world war two, and surely it would be far better to just not have Kaiser ort Hitler, syurely these people are just victioms of history lessons, as if somebody said it would have been better if Pol Pot took over Germany in 1930s, and killed a third of it's people, so less than the amount of people who died in WW2, they would not agree, and few would, and anyhow the Kaiser was very ready to ally to Hitler, and the King oF Italy, appointed Hitler's Hero, Mussolini, for no good reason. In every case, monarchy has killed millions, and is always wrong, the Ottom,an empire, killed and tiortured it's people, so did the Belgian royals, but they have no stigma, around them, when of course they should have. Every monarchy despite the tonnes of people they killed, anti equality ideals, and inequality they were about has no stigma, They should feel ashamed, fo them,seloves being so eevil,

For every example of monarchy there is, people say, they were right, but if you look at the fats, which they never do, and look deep enough, you find out, under them and as of their views loads more died, tyhean in republicanism, from, the Ottomans, too Swziland, too Japan. Maonrchy is not created for equalit, and so does not help people and causes deaths.

If you look at history, it is so often the case no monarch is balmed cfor bad eve3nts when they led, even though time and time again the monarchs made the choices that caused war, and were the only peop[le who copuld have stopped it, and were what the other war mongers most loved,. and often mionarchists suppiort what they did, It is insane, nobody sees this, fact, Monarchy is dictatoral and evil and wrong, The only defebnces it can have are ludicrous cult like , lies.

And here is another amazing fact, Royalists endlessly claim give us back our palaces that we had "stolen" off us 90 years ago, to republics who abolished them, but they will never giove back the property they stiole, like William the Cobnquerers, descendants will never give back the property they stole, or kings who took land in later takes, they never shall return the treasures they stole, as they are evil, money grubbers,

A good thing for Austria to do in WW1, would have been instead of invading Serbia, to request a apology, sanctions, send in terrorist forces , assassins, or bigger defences in Bodnia, or even withdrawing from Bosnia, to have occupied Bosnia, and then invaded Serbia, as one terrorist attacked it, was evil, Serbia did not desrve millions of deaths for that, even sanctions on Serbia could have been considered, but nop, ior having better protected leaders, but no.

Another bad thing the present British monarchy did ,was they changed the Olympics. This saw the Olynmpics have to be a bit of 100 of metres extra in lengh than it was then that a little while later that guy almost won a Marathon but collapsed in teh stadium, And so lost, So in a way he would have deservedly won otherwise. This was the present royals fault, BOOOOH. If anybody else had caused that, they would be condmmed for that, but not the monarchy for douing a shelfish interfering thing like that,. It is like how the Kaiser and Hirohito are never blamed for WW1 when they caused it, I bet even people who half died in that Mararthon of it being too long, would say what a disgrace and express hate if it was v a minor official who did it, but not if it was a shelfish monarch. sO MONARCHY IN this case shows it is a psycho ideal where no moral or feeling of guilt occurrs, Unlike socialism, where morals matters, and most socialist are ashamed of what bad any socialists did, and accept they need to change their beliefs as of that, but still remain pro moral, which is why monarchy killed more in the 20thc than socialism, as it is a psycho no morals ideal, not aiming for a better societujh, but monarchy which is why it is evill and socialism, is good and beat the nazis.

Maonarchists are evil as their only ideal is hate of republicanism and ousting themselves. republicans are good as their only aim is a better society which can not be done with monarchy so much

Somebody sent me a email sayiong so waht about men getting the throne higher than women, if born after, if you suppoert equality of sexes why not just equality and end the monarchy, somebody else said kingdom is sexist as kings are men, and the only people who like the term are self hating women, and men who hate women as they are inadaquate, I say so what if somebody is inadaquatem, well done inadaquate people for sticking at it, well done, good on for them that has nothing to do with the republican argumebnt, what nmatters is good and bad, not strong or weak, indeed strong people are worse than weak, its striong peopls in prisons not weak people,

Monarchy is wrong as it is undemocratic is can not counternance 51% of people wanting a new monarch as if that happens then the monarchy principle of successuon is beaten, so even 30% is too much, for them, so any opposistion is needing taken as their supporter and to them must revere them as better, so it is undemocratic in democracy 99% can oppose teh leasder he can be ousted or she, and still democarcy exists unlike in monarchy, it can not counternance opposition and has to just go on and on at them, saying agree with us, as your leaders and higher elites, whereas in democarcy all people from former king (unless he a criminal act guy in which case he needs punishment like other criminals) right up to new born child are equals, and nobody HAS to agree the president MUSt be the president, so it foes not allow free thought dfoes monartcvhy or free govermenmt

People moan about stuff being named after Comies, but the Kaiser killed more than any Comie and there is loads named after him, and some Nazi stuff, like Volkswagens, and also Imperial has loads of stuff named after it so stop moaning about comies stuff when monarchy is far worse

I am also fed up of how some royalists calim to be left wing condemning Bish, then they allign to Buish constantly, having dinner with him, and always ally to the rightm everywhere, in the end, and are to the right even of Bush,

Also look at how the media make people pro right when the right we all know are worts, when people are asked hasd Britain improved since teh Queen took over in 1954 people say yes, thopugh she had no power, when asked has Britain improved since 1945 and Labour taking over they say no, surely wrong,

This is as monarchies only achievement is to glorify itself, while the people neter povertuy, whatever is popular at the time, they ally to, they never do good, that is just that, they just have achieved glorifying themselves qand so making the rest of the world less gloried,

The US constitution forbids monarchy anywhere in it, that is good,

I like the bit that says we will not have a official religon, pushed on people, and not forbid religon per say, its like golilocks, just right, and it has worked well,

What about the way some monarchists say Royals are just liek everybody else, do not critisise them, actually if so, they should be condemed just like all are at times, and not seen as Gods, then they snobbily do not even in 2007 in Britain want to marry somebody as she is of a lower class, get their own guards when they are supposed to be soldiers when people are sending them to Iraq, and lets s\ay teh first one is a terrible disgusting puke making snobby thingm, but teh second of course that would happen teh position of monarchy is wrong aimmoral and of course they are not living like equals, funny how they get stuff when it suits them thats are always for their good, if they want to be seen as equals for their own sake, tjhey get seen as it, if not, they do not, that shows they are trweated better and that teh monarchy is a bad system, and the way they need bodyguards shows a inefficient way, and shows they are not living like all, and that monarchy needs to be abolished so all are born to equality, and we heave heads of state from all classes, as long as they are good people, They are not reated teh same, and it may be bad for the, but more importtantntly it harms equality and is bad for most. News Flash May 2007, they are not even going to Iraq, as they might get hurt, thats soldiers jobs, its a disgrace, so they do not need to go, even though they claim to be in the army, it shows monarchy is a wrong, against equality, and bad, all sensible people want equality and freedom, they are not in with that at all, it shows monarchy does not fit in with equality, and all that is needed.

Royalists are often very childish, they feel they have to comment on every anti monarchy as if they are the gestapo, I realise Royalism is anti democratic, as it says you can not in any circumstances oppose monarchy, it jumps on republicans, and tries to get them onside, as if it really matters, when in a real democarcy you must be allowed to be against the head of state without being jumped on, in extremist ways by the monarchy. So well donme all anti royalists you are democarcy's real open mind,

Also the monrcahy calim all the credit for good in the lands they are in, but none of the bad, even though democracy and freedom and equality are best and their dictatoral ways usually caused the bad, i.e the Romanian monarchy apopointed far right people in the 1930s, but always their histories ignore what they did, in appointing these people, even though these people did not have popular support, just like in Yugsolvia, in the 1930s, and Italy with the King that appointed their 1930s fascist leader, even the 1910s German Kaiser supported Hitler in many ways in the 1930s, just like surely they should maybe inherit the guilt if they inherit the wealth of bad they caused, the same goes for blame them for bad stuff they caused, especially ion ways that were not even barel;y indirect but were obvious acts of their's, where they had power,

Britain's monarchy will brook no opposition, despiteachieving nothing for anybody whatso ever, and her family being useless. and her being a waste of everybody's time, and her being about as democratic as Alabaman segragation, Napoleon the third, and a dictator re-elected to become president for life, they force themselves down everybody's throats just l;ike any dictator,

August 2008 In what has been labelled a “triumph of pomposity”, an advertisement for beer has been withdrawn from Australian billboards at a cost of nearly £5000 after complaints by monarchists upset at its apparent pro-republican sentiment.

“Forget the monarchy, support the publicans” declared the cheeky billboard for Coopers beer, one of Australia’s favourite brews.

But the Australian Monarchists League (AML) was not amused and, with the new centre left government aiming to reignite the republican debate in Australia, they complained to the Coopers,demanding that the billboards be taken down.

Another reason to fear royalists is that they hate all who disagree with their choice of head of state, its noty like us who accept others have a view, they just despirse and say things like you are this or that or like this evikl guy, thats reduced I think since I launched my campaign but we need as much veitreol to beat their view,

Making Georgia a monarchy would be a disaster. Such a figure would be a expensive waste of money, and would destablize Georgia. He could also be a pawn of politicians, rich businessmen, and foreign governments. The idea he could protect democracy is crazy. Surely if that were his role, he would have power, and if that were so, then no moatter how little power, then that would mean Georgia would be a less than democratic land. Georgia needs to be a republic and a democracy, and any element in the constitution where a unelected figure has power for life, over the nation, is a entirely anti democratic and dangerous ideal. That is the same constitutional system that saw Mussolini and Japan's Fascists, and Romania's Iron Guard come to power.

Somebody once said, that the Congo genocide of the 1880s - 1920s was not the evil kings fault but Social Darwinism, it was monarchy;'s fault just as any other form of dictatorship os dissproved by its acvtions

In 2008 we see low life Royalists want Brits to swear an allegiencae to the Queen, even those for whom it is against their religon, like me, I say, if Royalist low lives want to live in a land where people swear allegiance to the crown, they have a option GO AWAY AND LIVE IN SAUDI ARABIA OR SWAZILAND, NOW

Remember in 2007 a Spanish jouranlist was jailed for criticising the monarchy, by fascist laws, that royalsists liove as royalists are fascists

The Nepalese monarchy used Conservation cash it is alleged on themselves, happily the Nepalese Monarcfhy who pushed Nepal to poverty and war has now been abolished.

Here are some more sites, there are books and articles on the subjects in many internet places, or internet book shops, bookstores, at the bottom, are lists of which were the worst regimes of the past few centuries.

The Evil of 21st Century Monarchies, good for after reading the 7 pages of this great book

A site stating which ideal killed the most in the 20th Century, the answer is royalism, and Fascism, and that the left saved a billion people in the 20th Century

A site on the El Nino Famines that killed 10s of millions of Indians, and Chinese and others in the 19th Century

The Crimson book of Royalty page 1

The Highland Clearances how many died, in this,

A site on the 10 oldest and newest republics

An Index for our sites, with links to 100s of our greatest sites.

Which regimes killed the most people in the 19th Century, find out here, http://www.lonympics.co.uk/The%2010%20most%20evil%20regiomes%20of%20the%2019th%20centrury.htm

A site on the Belgian Congo, and how the king of that land killed 10s of millions of Congolese

The Internet handbook of why the French Revolution was good

The most evil regimes of the 19th Century

A site on 1640s Britain

Worst 18th Century regimes

What were the nicest regimes ever

An Index with links to almost all our 100s of sites.

The Best regimes ever in terms of achievers

Worst 17th Century regimes ever

A site stating what have been the world's largest empires ever

What would happen in a war between these sides

What were the most evil regimes ever

Royalty free music

A list stating what were the worst 1990s regimes

What were the worst 16th Century regimes ever

What were the worst 15th Century regimes ever

What were the worst 2000s regimes

A site stating the 10 largest majority English speaking lands, as their main tongue in the world

Pro-democracy site

A list of some fun sites

A site stating what are the 10 largest cities in Celtic lands, and a list of lands which are considered Celtic

A site on space, and the records to do with this subject

A site on giant sloths, and a link to the subject of 10 feet tall terror birds, from 2 million years ago, that could catch and eat large mammals

A site on a time traveling revolutionary

Also the guy who founded the Olympics Coubertin, a French Guy, based many of his ideals on the ideals on the French Revolutionm of peace, equality and such and you can not have monarchy in equality, it is just not possible, to have a monarchy in it, Jules Rimet who founded the World Cup founded a newspapaer in 1898 he founded a newspaper Christian, Republican and Democratic, "La Revue", which merged in January 1899 with Le Sillon Marc Sangnier, who made many more strong Catholics than even before break with the monarchy. so the world cup and Olym,pics were founded By Republican French Revolutionaryists

Holocaust stats

The world's 10 most powerful countries in 2008

My Worst regimes of the 20th century essay

My worst regimes of the 20th century stats

My history index

A site stating who the first terrorists were, - French Royalists

A site condemning the 1640s massacres against Scotland by Royalists in the 1640s

A site on the massacres in Naples of the 1790s-1800s, and a list which shows Royalists massacred more people, than any other side in 1789-1816.

Birthplaces of PMs

A site on 1917 flu, and why it is right to blame monarchy for the deaths

A list of evil kings

Evil 21st C monarchies