The crimson book of Royalty 7

So that is that monarchy is wrong, I have prooven it, yipppeeeeee

But happily even in feudal days Tibet was not a monarchy, it was a state ran in a way far more mysitcal and republican and oligarchical than that. The Dalai Lama, upto the Chinese occupation from the 1950s used to run the land with the monks. The Dalai lama is said to be the re-incarnation of prior Dalai Lamas. There have said to have been 14 Dalai Lamas, who are said to be found by Monks, usually from within Tibet, it happens like this. In the 1930s, on the death of what some call the 13th Dalai Lama, a search party of monks was sent out to find the incarnation of the Dalai Lama, they worked on omens, like where the last embammed body of the Dalai Lama's head was facing, and dreams of important monks. They went to where the present Dalai Lama, lived as a 2 year old as it looked like one in a Major Monk's dreams places, and they gave the child toys, and the child said it's mine it's mine, about the toys, the prior Dalai Lama had had. They renamed the child Holy Lord, Gentle Glory, Compassionate, Defender of the Faith, Ocean of Wisdom. He began a monastic education at 6, and was from then the Dalai Lama. This is not like a monarchy as it is not the case that only a mini master race can be the head of state, theoretically anybody can, and the monks who decide are really just like a club. It is deffinately nopt democracy, but it is said the present Dalai Lama, supports democracy, and opposes the feudalism, practiced in Tibet to 1959. The present Dalai Lama considers himself half-Marxist, half-Buddhist, and has been very willing to make deals with China over Tibet. He would want Tibet to be a democratic nation, with him not holding any official power. From a democratic, pro republican standpoint, I think that is ok, unlike monarchy which always wants to force it's position as head of state of all people including people who oppose it. Plus the fact is from a democratic standpoint, the Monks, are just like a club and clubs should be allowed freedom to do as they wish and choose leaders in their own ways. The club decides it's own rules, and laws as long as they stay within principles of the nation's equality, and freedom principles. That is among the most mysitical things about Tibet. And also in a way anybody can become Dalai Lama, in a way. It is a cool thing. It is based on the principles of Buddhism so is like a club, not a self supporting dynasty. Tibet's Dalai Lama, has come up with a way of being a club but not a dictatoral government, and is not like monarchs who usually search fopr glory and money, and ways of using their tiotle for cash, or who suie for the rifght to be called king, seeming like their eyes are filled with dollars and glory and treasure, the Dalai Lama is a religous figure, often religon is bad, and full of bigots but he is opne of those ones who say soothing good words for peace and good and are honestl;y like a mandela or a gandhi as they want just the good of their religon, not the evil, many kings like to be it all, like many even though they started wars get sanctified even though they Monarchy supports a ideal which is totally anti equality and is based on anti equality so can only be a aid to unfairnness and a worse society, and always demands others have to accept them, as head of state allways whether they like it or not, and like to claim we are not being nice, for not doing so when we are being nice as we are supporting equality and they are not being nice as they oppose it, and are demanding us to szee their belief as right when it does not matter really, and are so abusive and demeaning in mind towards those who oppose their view, the idea of this surely is that royals are a mini master race better than all of us, when they are not they are no better than everybody else, when the Dalai Lama can come and be of any person in his land, born to poor rich or pauper parents brought up by monks which was allways more allowing of poorer people across time, than aristocratic elitist methods of rule, and which today allows all classes into it, so a club that is able to survive in a soecity of equality, fraternity and liberty, as long as it accepts democarcy and holds by good principles, unlike monarchy just can not, So that beats the patronisibng stupid royalists the inequality element is why so many Americanm right wingers and nazis and elitists and gangsters support monarchy, i hate it when some l;efgt wing democrats do, but they are propbabaly the element of liberal elitists who accept racism, as ok, and have snobby views of certain innocent groups, the idiot elemenmt who do not realise how important equality is, in left wing principles, The best american principles are based on Yeoman republican democracy, and socialism, as the founding fathers wanted,

Roman Emperors killed Jesus,. and al;l monarchs have some sort of lineage claim, from the word rex and king, the latin meaning of king, and how later royal idealists idealised teh roman empire, while Constatntite was not a king, but a person who took powrt, like a democratic party does, it is also against all religons like Islam, and Budhism etc and against all secularists and athietss as it hasd oppressed them so much

Down with scumbags that go round the world kissing monarchs buts, when these demons have killed 100s of millions

Another bad thing about is monarchists is loads of them are the types in the media who just slag people off all day, then when it comes to the monarchy they suck up to them I suppose it is the game theory on hop and if we beat monarchy we are beating the game theory and creating a more equal world, stopping the low lives being able to kiss but up and kick those below them then we can just me more equal, and those above them are just there as equal citizens put them there, so can spit on these low life royalistsm, it is a fact that we need a republic to beat back veil

An advert site for our best sites,

Rivers A site on Rivers across the world,

GREAT JOKESg

SOLAR SYSTEM RECORD BREAKERS, facts like which is the tallest mountain for the planets

LOADS OF COOL MUSIC

Switz Villas

WORST REGIMES OF THE 20TH CENTURY

Geography sites, like what are the 10 largest English speaking countries, and 10 largest Celtic cities, and biggest forests, etc. etc.,

We have A anti-bully site gggg ddddddddd

SOME FUN CLEVER COOL GAME

These horrible monarchs believe there must be a constituion where they are regarded as better than all, Even though they have done nothing what so ever for the good of the nation or the people, other than be statues and be paid loads of cash, that could have gone to foreign aid. Barbados had support for a republic, but the skin crawling bullying creeps in the royal family sent people over to Barbados to say do not do this, What a load of demons. They oppose equality, and freedom, and support them being regarded as better than everybody else, as is proven by their connections with the slave owner saudi royal family. that caused Osama Bin laden. What a horrible bunch of evil scum these royalists are causing terrorism, loving slavery, basing their rule on inheritance from people like Butcher Cumberland, and Edward I, a who massacred men women and children, and they also descend off other horrible scum who comitted evil acts like that.. like James VI who torturted a suspected witch to death, and Charles I, who caused a massive war in his land, purely so he could rule as tyrant, never accepting negotaitionsm, nad casuibng massacres uop and down the land, from Aberdeen, to Bolton, to South West England, And Leicster, Wanting to rule as a tyrant purely so he could take money for his paintings, for himself, from tax from the people. ,And another Edward VII who was a Nazis sympathiser, Why can't they just quit and be worshipped by all the nasty types who like them, in a republic, and hopefully realise how immoral they are after that, and stop being worhsipped, while we can have a republic without these terrible evil people being expecting worship .

The worst thing about royalists is they hate socialists fort having a utiopian belief that has always mostly led to betterness

So here is my unilateral declaration for all us oppressed Socialist republicans in the European Union, The EU may not officially call itself a republic, but lets face it it is, So I declare that it is a republic, and that we do not live in a monarchym, The Queen is like that guy who declares to be King of the Picts on Skye, and all Royalists are like that. So I win. And the Royalists lose, Yes on Wikipedia it has a list of monarchs, I put transvestites on tghe list as they are queens, it is unfair on trabnsvestites that they list people who are crazy lunatics and assoaciated with the Nazis like the Queens of the Netherlands, but not transvestites who never hurt a fly. They should have the decent people who want to be on the list of loonies as well as the other loonies,.

So here is the passage that proves this.

Yes the European Maastricht treaty thing allowed loads of royals of no importantce,

You may say that means it is a union of many forms of union, but then again, surely all that is happening, is that they are siging a treaty the but the statements in the Constitution, state these Republican statements that the people are refferred to as citizens, The most important statement is "political will of the citizens of the Union" What the countries that are part of it decide are unimportant. So the European Union is a republic. And it says Every person holding a nationality of the European Union is a CITIZEN, This means every person, king etc is a citizen, so that is that

Yes the treaty allows monarchs to have their statements "highness" and such but that is just like how theWeaimar Republic allowed people to call themselvesd Von, which is a aristocratic title Like Von Dracula, The facts monarchs are also signing is just like how they sign ttreaties with republics, the other lands are sending representatives it is their mad choice who they send, but the monarchs have no control over the EU, that is that the EU is a republic, So we in Europe all iove in a Republic, as to Andorra as it has no monarchs and the UN is a republic too.

If any judge says otherwise about the EU, or a poll it dio not matter as the EU is the EU and exists, just liek how Australia is a monarchy even when most want tit to be otherwise,. And if any judge claim the EU is not a republci,l the facts is they are just wrong, and do not understand what a republic is. The EU is a republic, like Switzerland, as it is ruled by a council of 10s of members who send represetnataives from their democarcices and there is NO monarchial instirtution in the EU. the parliaments is elected and all the other bodies are at their beg and call, and a are meritocratic, or at the very worst just nepotistic, that is not monarcjhial so the EU is a republic,. I suppose it is my greatest achievment in life so far, outside of things to do with my family.

The Un is for the same reasons. a republic as of it's wording,

So monarchy liek cannibalism, may be considered quaint by some loony rightist but it has been crushed by the left

Here is my list of list of surviving queens, the Queens of lost of lands, and transvestites, and also some kings like that King of the Picts guy who lives on Skye. so they are all a bit silly, except the ones who realise it is a disgrace and sa stupid systenmm, depending on ea evil history,

One person said the Queen in Britain is just like a rich medieval lady sitting on priceless amounts of money she does nobody else any good with, she makes republicans swear a oath of allegiance horribly, if they do not they can not be full citizens if they do they are called hypocvrits then teh royal evil media, claim this is showing republicans in a bad light, when it shows how horrible and arrogant royalists are, and that Prince Charles is like the charachter in being there, Prince Harry is a coward and Prince william annoying putting his face in every thibng creepily that have nowt top do with him, like the fa cup 2007, why can;'t there be things l;eft out for republicdans to enjoy wiothout them using them as propganada pieces for the, it is unafir and creepy and arrogant of them,

I hate the way Royalists go on abouyt the reign of terror but do not mention there own crimes, wehen the French Revoluition was good, and they were not, also if we should say the F Revolutiopn was just about executiosn why not say how all royalists ion Britain are to do with Queen Victoria not caring about whole families dying in famines, or Vlad the Imapller putting people on Stakes, of James VI torturing, I think that is right republicans want goodm, monarchists kujust their own carry on, and good is a lesser thing to their ideals, if not the royals themselves and that has an affect

Even if most support monarchy, they support a dictatoral ideal, like Nazis-ism when it won the populat vote, and Napoleon 3rd which is not democarcy, if people vote for a dictator to rule for life, it is not proper democarcy,

Also I hate the way Royals go around creepilly stalking the major events they are creepy stalkers, the way they push themselves into major events.

The UN says even more pro equality stuiff in it's declarations, so is a republican way, so we must remember the attrocities by monarchy and how we have defeated them, we have crushed them into the ground, though their emebers must be beaten

The Eu is like how the USSR had in the 1950s still some tribes obeying slave ways in some remote areas, but it was still a republic, the fact some places still have monarchs does not make the EU a monarchy, just like how Ethiopia a republic has some remote tribes with tribal chiefsm, and Brazil, they are still republics, and anyhow the monarchs have no power over the eu and if so it's not it's fault its lands which joined the eu whioch do not decide if the eu is a republic. Even if you say othwerriwse it is, IDT IF destroyed true, the definition of a republic fits ionto the eu, as all peopel are equal in it, There is no monarcvhial element in the pill;ars of the eu and so al its things make it a republic,

As I say the EU works on the Switz commune, and smurfs, and gnomes republic way, of lots of people working togther, as equals, the leading council, gets members sent from all members as if it were a republic, under the leaders who are all equals, and there is no inmage style politiocs in the chamber it is all debate and do this, not the presidential system, but a elect lots of members from all over the land, as in all eu lands have univerasal suffrage and send a rep to the EU commision, so that is republican as they are all equals, even the leader is not that big a posistion, so iot is not the big manm, at head of table chooses all way, not that the us way is not republican but the eu way is republican too, and the buerocracy is their servant just as in th us, so the eu ios a demoacrtic republic

Yipppeeee we have won i have won, that is that

The UN is a republic too so helps all other lands, even Antartica which the UN sauys nobody owns so it has rule over it

In 2006 I realised the EU constituinal treatuies and UN stuff says they belive in equality and citizens, so nobody is superior to any other this makes them republics so we win, as republicans, I say yes kings and such are mentioned nut so are they as tribal chiefs in republics of brazil and Ethiopia but they are still republics and us declar treatuies accept kinsg statemenst like surrender so it is a republic so is gnome style no big man at tope of tibale, eu commison a republic like the smurfs all deciding what to dio wubn uninson drom universal suffrage members sent from, each anybody e who says otherwise judge or politician is an idiot and liar, for whatever reason they sday it it is still so like switz communes and commonwealth of poland, and gnomes in a comitte what is best for the em each as equals, The treaty of Nice also states the EU is for equality, so that is that. The treaty of the late 1990s, of minor changes, to help new member join, it also was for freedom, and solidarity,
History is fun, useful for arguments, and a lesson for the future,
The only dangerous statement was it saying the EU rests these values on the traditiosn of the eu statesm but it says common to eu states, so monarchy is not that so it only equality as a tradition of all eu states, so it is a republic,

This world map, shows as of my UN and EU republic wins, and also declaring Antartica a reupblic, as part of the UN, some git may say otherwise but I have saud that so anywhere on it that is lumoinous green (radioactive) is monarchial, none is. come back to here or look at my other stuff

SO WITHIN the UN and EU the loonny nasty royalists who celebrates the deaths 0f 30,000 people at the massacre of Berwick, and the Royals themselves are rubbished as not treiging over us, but as fools, like clan chiefs who sent away their populations in the Highland Clearances and are now just nothing, and the same for the kings,

SO WE THANK the EU for reducing the royals to the level of fictional kings, and what they desrve to be, even if the arrogant thugs who support them do not think so

The fact some members may have powerless monachs, does not stop the EU being a republic, just as the fact that the Kaiser's German Empire, had Hamburg which was a republic even if a right wing style one, did not stop the German Empire beibg a monarchy to 1918, i.e some people make claims to be king of Bardsey Isle, in W3al;es, or Lundy Isle, but they are not regarded as superior, even if they were elected pm, or chosen to sign a treaty and put that title on it, as they would be allowed to just as anybody is allowed to add titles, the fact is the eu is a repub,lic, and secular but allowing religous beliefs to influnce views, as there is little about religon in it, if people wish to belive in God they are allowed to, sdo it id not goddless, it is secular. so that is that the eu is a republic, and so all European nations are

In 2008 there were allegations of corruption against the monarchy of Britain, as "Prince" Andrew sold his home 3 million Pounds (6 million dollars) above the sale and guide Price, after 5 years of it being on sale, MP Ian Davidson said there were serious questions. The Kazak energy tycoon buying the house, is feared to have made a deal with the "prince" who is a trade "ambassador" for Britain, so something to do with trade and such then, hmmmm, if this was a case of Corruption, then it and the alleged Mark Thatcher Saudi corruption case, would mean that 2 uncriticised right wingers were the lead corruption deals of the past 30 years, by a massive mile,

Oh yeah in 2007 or 2008 Fascists arrested a Spanish jouirbnalist for drawing a unflattering cartoon about the royals, the fascist royals must be ousted in a referendum, or parliamentry vote in Spain, for using anti democracy ideals, Spain's monarch also shouted abuse at Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, while the King of Spain is still being friends with dictatorals kings across the world, like ones in the Mid East, The "Prince" specifically has been involved with energy deals with Kazakhstan, Royals around the world, have massive histories of corruption, if he is corruopt he should be jailed for life, Aslso in 2009 May, the Barcelona dn Bilbao fans booed the prescence of the monacrhy at their match, and the media censored this, the Spanish king helpedmanouvrewe against the elected leadersin the earlu 1980 some say

Alsoin 2009 Acanmada and Australia favour a republic on many pooos,l but no refernda comes

So since I started this cmpaign against monarchy in about 2001, I am not saying becauseof me of course, I am writing this in 2008, December, maybe I shall concentrate more on business now, but am stull interested in decreasing royal power, Nepal has outsed its monarchy Bhutan, Saudi, Qatar, UAE, and Bahrain have reduced royal power, a bit, Luxemburg has withdrawn the power of the grand duke to apprive legislation as of him not approving a euthnasia bill in 2008, now he can only promulgate, Cambodias monarchs have turned from powerful forces to puppet, Swazilands monachs now have real opposition, I realised the EU is a republic, so we all in Europe live in a Republic, and the UN too, in reality, as Republics do not need to be called Republics, Bulgarias king lost an election, Thailand's monarchy has more internal opposition, Canada and Australia, and NZs repulican movem,ents are stronger, the Cahbnnel isles have lost more roual prerogitives or whatever, Northern Ireland has lost the word royal from its police force, Tonga's royals have lost allot of power, Samoa has become a republic, and theree may be more, on the bad side, the king of Liechtenstein has more power, but he is more opposed now, too,

Here are some more sites, there are books and articles on the subjects in many internet places, or internet book shops, bookstores, at the bottom, are lists of which were the worst regimes of the past few centuries.

The Evil of 21st Century Monarchies, good for after reading the 7 pages of this great book

A site stating which ideal killed the most in the 20th Century, the answer is royalism, and Fascism, and that the left saved a billion people in the 20th Century

A site on the El Nino Famines that killed 10s of millions of Indians, and Chinese and others in the 19th Century

A Critique of the Political opinions of the Prince of Wales

Why it was right to punish Tsar Nicolas, Charles I, and the French Kings, even when right wingers call them martyrs, when they were murderers. Who deserved punishment just as much as any modern criminals. Or the crinminals of their time.

The Crimson book of Royalty page 1

The Highland Clearances how many died, in this,

A site on the 10 oldest and newest republics

An Index for our sites, with links to 100s of our greatest sites.

Which regimes killed the most people in the 19th Century, find out here,

A site on the Belgian Congo, and how the king of that land killed 10s of millions of Congolese

A site saying how the Communists have moral authority over the right in Russia

Why the French Revolution was good

The most evil regimes of the 19th Century

A site on 1640s Britain

Worst 18th Century regimes

What were the nicest regimes ever